Trade Cases
AIIS: Disappointed But Not Surprised by Section 232 Decision
Written by Sandy Williams
March 5, 2020
Earlier this week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled against an appeal by the American Institute for International Steel challenging the constitutionality of the Section 232 tariffs. The court affirmed a ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade, which upheld the Trump administration’s tariffs on imported steel.
“While disappointed, we are not surprised by the appeals court ruling,” said AIIS President Richard Chriss. “We have expected all along for this constitutional question, ultimately, to be decided by the nation’s highest court. We intend to seek Supreme Court review promptly, and we are hopeful that the court will act before it adjourns in June.”
AIIS argues that Congress, by enacting Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Action of 1962, delegated unrestricted powers to the executive branch that the Constitution reserves solely to Congress. This violation of the separation of powers led to the Trump administration imposing tariffs on steel imports under the auspices of national security.
The USCIT and the Court of Appeals based their rulings on the 1976 Supreme Court case, Federal Energy Administration vs. Algonquin SNG, Inc., which upheld the constitutionality of Section 232. Previous administrations have used the provision for explicit trade restrictions such as quotas, said AIIS, but Trump is the first president to use it to impose tariffs.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.
Global steel forum sets 2026 framework deadline as US ups pressure on excess capacity
Global steelmakers sounded the alarm Friday over the deepening excess steelmaking capacity crisis. Ministers at the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) in Gqeberha, South Africa, pledged to...
CRU: China’s indirect steel exports find new destination markets
The boom in China’s direct steel exports has not stopped this year, even with a rise in protectionist measures globally. The increase is driven by...