Trade Cases
Congress Reps Oppose S232 Tariffs on Transformer Parts
Written by Sandy Williams
October 28, 2020
Five congressional representatives are saying “don’t do it” to a proposal to impose Section 232 tariffs on imports of transformer cores, laminates and transformers.
In a letter to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, Virginia Reps. Denver Riggleman, Ben Cline, Morgan Griffith, Arkansas Rep. Bruce Westerman and North Carolina Rep. Dan Bishop said that imposition of tariffs or other restrictions on imported transformer products would put at risk 15,000 transformer industry jobs and undermine the reliable supply of low-cost electricity in the U.S.
“The principal cause of increased imports of cores, laminations and transformers, which are not unfairly traded, is the levying of Section 232 import restrictions on grain-oriented steel into the United States,” said the group. “The transformer industries have relocated operations, principally to Canada and Mexico, to preserve their own competitiveness in the market.”
The Congressmen list five negative results that will likely occur should the tariffs on transformer parts be imposed:
- Loss of jobs in the U.S. Power and Distribution Transformer industries
- Higher utility/electricity bills, which will impact all American consumers
- Threats to national security through weakening of the competitive structure of the American transformer industry
- Delays in the critical upgrade of the U.S. electrical grid, which requires procurement by American electric utilities of large numbers of transformers over a short period of time
- Deterioration of trade, defense and commercial relationships with Canada and Mexico. These relationships are the source of 85% of U.S. imports of transformer cores and laminations, whose electricity grids are physically, strategically and economically linked with the U.S. power grid.
“Against the clear risk to national economic health (and our national defense), there is no justifications for the imposition of tariffs or other trade restrictions, especially on two of our closest allies and partners in the world. Section 232 import restrictions would not remedy the operations of the sole current manufacturer of grain-oriented electrical steel in the United States and will certainly worsen the problems of downstream U.S. industries that will be affected.”
The only producer of grain-oriented electrical steel in the United States is AK Steel, now a part of Cleveland-Cliffs.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Steel groups voice different takes on US-EU trade deal
US and European steel trade groups were at odds over their reaction to the recent trade deal President Trump brokered with the EU.
Here’s what’s up next in the big coated steel trade case
Attorneys representing domestic petitioners and foreign respondent companies have been busy filing case briefings and making rebuttals as the corrosion-resistant steel unfair trade investigations begin to wind down.
Price: Which countries get a ‘zonk’ in Trump’s primetime ‘Let’s Make a (Trade) Deal’ show?
As the president’s August 1 tariff deadline approaches, the “Let’s Make a Deal” game show returns to primetime (the Monty Hall version, of course). As the administration begins rolling out trade deals, we are starting to see what’s behind door number one and who is getting a “zonk.”
Trump says Canada deal might not happen: Report
President Trump said a negotiated deal with Canada might not occur, and all existing tariffs, along with those set to take effect soon, will stay in place, according to media reports.
Steel trade groups applaud Trump’s S232 tariffs
Five trade organizations involved with North American steel have praised President Trump’s Section 232 tariffs on steel for helping the domestic industry.