Trade Cases
Section 232 Adds Nearly $2 Billion to Gov't Coffers in FY20
Written by Michael Cowden
February 8, 2021
Section 232 tariffs on imported steel and aluminum netted the U.S. government nearly $2 billion in its 2020 fiscal year.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) collected $1.3 billion in Section 232 tariffs on imported steel in fiscal 2020 and $500 million in tariffs on imported aluminum, according to a recent report from the agency.
The federal government’s fiscal 2020 began on Oct. 1, 2019, and ran through Sept. 30, 2020.
All told, CBP has collected nearly $7.52 billion in Section 232 steel tariffs and approximately $2.36 billion in alumium tariffs since the trade measure took effect on March 23, 2018, according to data updated each week by the agency.
Most countries face duties of 25% on steel imports and 10% on aluminum imports. Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and South Korea are exempt from Section 232 tariffs.
CBP also oversees collections stemming from other non-traditional trade actions such as Section 201 duties on washing machines, washing machine parts, and solar panels, as well as Section 301 on goods from China.
“Despite the pandemic, CBP collected $74.4 billion in duties, a 3.5 percent increase over FY2019,” the report said, noting that much of the increase came thanks to Sections 232, 201 and 301.
Section 201 netted the government more than $900 million in its last fiscal year and roughly $2.35 billion since taking effect on Feb. 7, 2018. The majority of Section 201 duties–$2.09 billion, or 88% of the total– stem from duties on solar panels. Canada is exempt from the measure.
The bulk of all tariffs collected by CBP result from Section 301 duties on China. Section 301 on Chinese goods brought $35.6 billion into government coffers in fiscal 2020–or approximately 48% of the $74.4 billion collected in the last fiscal year thanks to the three Sections.
Section 301 was rolled out July 6, 2018, per CBP, but did not take effect in significant terms until 2019.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.