Trade Cases
Tariff Reform Coalition: Time to Roll Back Section 232
Written by Tim Triplett
March 26, 2021
It’s time to roll back the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and the Section 301 tariffs on imports from China, which are inflicting significant harm on U.S. businesses and workers, argued the National Foreign Trade Council on Wednesday in an appeal to the Biden administration. The NFTC’s briefing paper, “Why Recent Tariff Increases Harm Our Economy,” was signed by the Tariff Reform Coalition, a group of 37 manufacturing and agricultural trade groups in an appeal to President Biden to reconsider the high Trump-era tariffs.
Comments from Biden administration officials have been generally supportive of the tariffs and the American jobs they protect, but have not stated definitively if they will support the trade actions long term.
Opponents argue that the tariffs, and the retaliation they prompt by foreign governments, puts U.S. manufacturers, distributors and farmers at a disadvantage to foreign competitors and threaten far more jobs than they protect, at a time when American businesses are already struggling with the economic downturn caused by COVID-19.
“As American businesses and workers struggle with the effects of the pandemic, this is the worst possible time to turn inward and continue maintaining high trade barriers, including Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs,” the group wrote in its appeal. “The Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum should be removed as soon as possible. There are ample authorities under other trade laws, recognized as legitimate under WTO agreements if properly applied, to address problems of steel and aluminum subsidies or global overcapacity in a way that would minimize adverse impacts on the majority of U.S. companies and workers.”
Emotions are strong on both sides of the issue, with steel industry trade groups adamantly urging the administration to stay the course on Section 232, despite the record high steel prices in the U.S. The American Iron and Steel Institute and the Steel Manufacturers Association, declared their support this week of a new study by the Economic Policy Institute that found the Section 232 tariffs put in place in 2018 have been effective in countering trade-distorting practices by China and other nations and should be kept in place until a permanent solution to the chronic problem of excess global steel production capacity is achieved.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.