Trade Cases

US to Temporarily Lift Section 232 Tariffs from Ukrainian Steel
Written by Michael Cowden
May 9, 2022
The US will for one year lift Section 232 tariffs from Ukrainian steel, the Commerce Department said.
The move is necessary to support Ukraine in its war against Russia and because steel plays an outsized role in the Ukrainian economy, Commerce said in a press release on Monday, May 9.
Case in point: Steel employs one in 13 Ukrainians, the department said.
“We can’t just admire the fortitude and spirit of the Ukrainian people – we need to have their backs and support one of the most important industries to Ukraine’s economic well-being,” Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said.
“For steel mills to continue as an economic lifeline for the people of Ukraine, they must be able to export their steel,” she added.
The move was not unexpected. US lawmakers on both sides of the aisle asked last month that the Biden administration ease Section 232 tariffs on Ukrainian steel.
Also, industry participants and trade policy experts had said that a temporary easing of Section 232 was in the works. And some have said the tariff suspension could be extended should the war with Russia drag on.
Most said that the impact on the North American steel market would be modest. Some SMU sources noted, for example, that they had previously imported steel plate from Azovstal in Mariupol, Ukraine. The city has been razed by Russian forces, and Azovstal, now a makeshift fortress, has become symbolic of Ukrainian resistance. But the mill has been all but destroyed in the fighting, and no plate is being exported from there or will be anytime soon.
Other steel products, given the difficulties of shipping via the Black Sea, will likely be exported to the European Union via train or truck. One exception might be energy tubulars such as oil country tubular goods (OCTG). Much of Ukraine’s production has been exported to the Middle East. But that situation on the Black Sea makes that logistically difficult, sources said. A portion of that OCTG production might be re-directed from customers in the Middle East to those in North America. It could be taken overland to Gdansk, a port city in Poland, and then exported to the US, they said.
Ukraine exported 130,636 metric tons of steel products to the US in 2021, according to Commerce Department figures. The bulk of those exports – 113,101.9 metric tons, or 86.6% – were pipe and tube. Only 9,705.7 metric tons, or 7.4%, were flat-rolled products, almost all of it cut-to-length plate or coiled plate.
Recall that Section 232 tariffs, 25% in the case of steel, were initially rolled out by the Trump administration in 2018. They have been kept largely in place by the Biden adminstration, although tariff-rate quota (TRQ) agreements to ease them have since been negotiated with the European Union, Japan and the United Kingdom.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com

Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases

Price on trade: What a difference a year makes!
As everyone surely knows by now, the SMU Steel Summit starts on Monday in Atlanta, Ga. So, this is a great opportunity to reflect on how much has changed since the 2024 Summit. Certainly, no one could have imagined the wholesale and transformative changes to U.S. and global trade policy.

Canadian steelmakers call for protection after US adds derivatives to S232
The Canadian Steel Producers Association expressed dismay upon the news that the Trump administration had added over 400 products to the list of derivative products covered by the 50% Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum.

China opens WTO dispute with Canada over steel, aluminum
China has requested dispute consultations with Canada at the WTO about Canadian measures on Chinese steel and aluminum imports.

Inclusion requests result in 400+ additions to S232’s derivatives list
The Commerce Department has added over 400 HTS codes to the list of steel and aluminum derivative products covered under the Section 232 tariffs.

Leibowitz on Trade: The New World Orders
The question of the new world order was on many minds last week when I spoke on another SMU Community Chat. The short answer is that nobody knows in detail what the effects of all the economic and geopolitical developments will be.