Trade Cases
Cliffs Challenges Decision to Sunset Brazilian CR Duties
Written by Laura Miller
October 7, 2022
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. is disputing the US International Trade Commission’s recent decision to allow antidumping and countervailing duties on cold-rolled steel flat products from Brazil to expire.
In July, the ITC completed five-year sunset reviews of the AD and CVDs on cold-rolled imports. While the agency decided that the duties should remain in place for China, India, Japan, South Korea, and the UK, it made a negative injury determination in regard to Brazil, which allowed those duties to expire.
The Cleveland-based flat rolled steelmaker is now challenging the ITC’s decision before the US Court of International Trade.
According to a court document obtained by SMU, Cliffs and other domestic producers argued in the sunset review that imports from all six countries, including Brazil, should be cumulated, and that they would be likely to cause material injury to the domestic industry upon revocation of the duties. The Commission was divided, however, in its ultimate decision not to cumulate the Brazilian product with the other subject imports.
The court complaint notes that “Commissioners relied heavily on the fact that the quota imposed on the cold-rolled steel imports from Brazil under section 232 … was ‘only’ 57,251 short tons,” whereas Korea’s annual quota limit is 141,108 short tons. Therefore they took into consideration that if the duties were allowed to expire for either country, Brazil could send far less cold rolled to the US than could Korea due to the quotas currently in place. They also relied on the assumption that 232 duties and quotas will remain in place for the foreseeable future. But Cliffs contends there is no guarantee of that.
Although the ITC ultimately issued the negative determination for Brazil, two members of the five-member Commission dissented from the decision.
Cliffs thinks the ITC’s ultimate decision wasn’t supported by evidence and is unlawful. The company is asking the CIT to remand the Commission’s final determination for Brazil to the ITC.
Cliffs did not have any additional comment for SMU beyond the court-filed complaint.
By Laura Miller, Laura@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Steel groups voice different takes on US-EU trade deal
US and European steel trade groups were at odds over their reaction to the recent trade deal President Trump brokered with the EU.
Here’s what’s up next in the big coated steel trade case
Attorneys representing domestic petitioners and foreign respondent companies have been busy filing case briefings and making rebuttals as the corrosion-resistant steel unfair trade investigations begin to wind down.
Price: Which countries get a ‘zonk’ in Trump’s primetime ‘Let’s Make a (Trade) Deal’ show?
As the president’s August 1 tariff deadline approaches, the “Let’s Make a Deal” game show returns to primetime (the Monty Hall version, of course). As the administration begins rolling out trade deals, we are starting to see what’s behind door number one and who is getting a “zonk.”
Trump says Canada deal might not happen: Report
President Trump said a negotiated deal with Canada might not occur, and all existing tariffs, along with those set to take effect soon, will stay in place, according to media reports.
Steel trade groups applaud Trump’s S232 tariffs
Five trade organizations involved with North American steel have praised President Trump’s Section 232 tariffs on steel for helping the domestic industry.