Steel Products

Steel Summit: Trade Panel Discusses Decarbonization and Trade
Written by Becca Moczygemba
August 25, 2023
Steel Summit’s trade panel opened the conversation around the ongoing negotiations between the US and EU, decarbonization, and trade.

The panel consisted of the president of the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), Philip K. Bell; president of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), Kevin Dempsey; trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz; and CSN’s executive director Jerry Richardson.
“Decarbonization has become a critical issue for the industry,” said Dempsey. “Traditionally at this conference, trade has been a big issue, and continues to be. Now, in addition to trade, we have the issue of decarbonization.”
The US is the lowest emission steel producer because our efficiency has led us there, rather than a government mandate, Dempsey added.
When asked what the outcome would be on the global arrangement on steel and aluminum between the US and EU by October, the panelists agreed that the US would likely not adopt a carbon credit program like that of the EU.
“Progress just isn’t being made at the office of the United States Trade Representative and the Commerce Department. I think it is due in large part to the fact that the EU is relying too heavily on their CBAM,” said Bell. Part of the EU CBAM policy (carbon border adjustment mechanism) is that you have to agree to it and must have something similar in your country to be a part of it, he continued.
“There won’t be a final agreement by October. I think that’s impossible,” said Leibowitz.
Leibowitz suggested that narrowing the differences and accommodating both systems, then subsequently using the International Trade Commission (ITC) study into greenhouse-gas emissions intensity to make a decision would be a favorable approach.
While we’ve seen the implementation of trade tariffs like Section 232 and antidumping and countervailing duties (ADD/CVD), panelists were asked about the likelihood of an additional tax.
There’s not as much steel exposed to Section 232 as you would think, said Richardson. It’s estimated that about 20-30% of steel is subject to Section 232 tariffs.
Richardson highlighted the necessity of imports, saying the domestic industry does not produce enough to meet demand.
Want more of the discussion? Join us at Tampa Steel, Jan. 28-30, 2024. Click here to register!

Becca Moczygemba
Read more from Becca MoczygembaLatest in Steel Products

Galv buyers less optimistic about short-term market
“It was a little more of a seller's market as contractors seemed to be protecting themselves against a potential run up in prices," one buyer said.

SMU flat-rolled market survey results now available
SMU’s latest steel buyers market survey results are now available on our website to all premium members. After logging in at steelmarketupdate.com, visit the pricing and analysis tab and look under the “survey results” section for “latest survey results.” Past survey results are also available under that selection. If you need help accessing the survey results, or if […]

US, offshore CRC prices continue to fall
US cold-rolled (CR) coil prices were down again this week, slipping six weeks in a row and seeing the sharpest drop-off since last July.

Asian HR remains much cheaper than US, EU product
Domestic hot-rolled (HR) coil prices fell this week, now down seven of the last eight weeks.

April service center shipments and inventories report
Flat rolled = 57.6 shipping days of supply Plate = 54.5 shipping days of supply Flat rolled US service centers’ flat-rolled steel supply edged up in April, as shipments slowed. At the end of April, US service centers carried 57.6 shipping days of supply, according to adjusted SMU data. This is up from 56.4 shipping […]