• Skip to main content

    Government/Policy

    Op-Ed: Mexican steel trade ‘myth’ - What US trade data really shows

    Written by Salvador Quesada Salinas


    In recent months, there has been loud, vocal commentary from the US against Mexico with respect to the steel trade between both countries, accusing Mexico of a huge surge in exports and of being a transshipment country for Chinese steel.

    However, these intense alarm signals appear to be crafting a narrative that sharply contrasts with publicly available data, particularly from the US. Why is that? Maybe it is somehow politically convenient to believe in a tired old myth, or perhaps it’s just an innocent mistake. Regardless, let’s let the numbers speak for themselves because numbers don’t lie.

    The numbers

    Both Mexico and the US have increased their bilateral trade in steel. However, the US has done so to a greater extent. The monthly average of finished steel exports from the US to Mexico in 2024 increased by 19% compared to the baseline 2015-2017 volume, while Mexico’s exports to the US grew by 7% in the same period.

    From January to June 2024, Mexico’s finished steel exports to the US decreased by 13% compared to the same period in 2023, while US shipments to Mexico increased by 3% during the same period. This increase is primarily due to higher exports of flat steel. These trends are consistent with those observed in 2023, when Mexico’s exports to the US fell by 28% compared to the previous year, whereas US exports increased by 11%.

    In addition to the above, it is important to highlight that the difference in the magnitude of the export volume of both countries has widened more and more each year. In 2022, US exports of finished steel were 13% higher than those of Mexico, but this difference increased to 74% in 2023, and if we annualize the January through June Census Data, the gap is on pace to grow to 94%. This illustrates that the US has benefited more from trade in finished steel than Mexico.

    The downward trend in Mexican exports to the US will continue in the coming months, according to the most recent information from preliminary Census data and SIMA license data.

    Let’s drill down into transshipments

    The claims by some US mills that there is transshipment of Chinese steel through Mexico are incorrect.

    In 2023, statistics from the US show that 144,000 metric tons (mt) of steel melted and poured in China entered the US via a third country. The top three origins were Thailand (52%), Oman (15%), and Canada (13%), while Mexico was 11th, exporting only 334 mt of Chinese melted steel.

    From Mexico’s perspective, those 334 mt represented only 0.01% of Mexican finished steel exports in 2023.

    Since implementing melted and poured tracking in October 2020, only 0.01% of the finished steel exported from Mexico to the US has been melted in China.

    To conclude, what are the numbers telling us?

    First, Mexico is not a backdoor for unfair trade from China but is a very important destination for US steel exports.

    Second, there are strong bonds between both countries’ supply chains.

    And third, there are still some trade inconsistencies that need attention.

    To compete in a regionalized world, improve our economies, attract more investments, and fight against China’s unfair trade practices, our regional ties could and must be reinforced.

    Engaging in a steel trade war based on myths and misconceptions is not a strategic decision; it won’t benefit the majority and will only diminish our region’s competitiveness.

    Editor’s note

    SMU welcomes opinions from across the steel industry. We’re happy to share the thoughts above from Salvador Quesada Salinas, general director of Mexico’s steel chamber, Canacero. If you have an opinion you’d like to express to the broader steel community, please contact us at info@steelmarketupdate.com.

    Salvador Quesada Salinas

    Read more from Salvador Quesada Salinas

    Latest in Government/Policy

    Price on trade: Steel industry trick-or-treat

    It’s the scariest time of year in Washington, D.C. … election season. The city is a veritable haunted house of prognostication and speculation as everyone tries to discern which way the howling wind will blow. We’ll let the fortune tellers and prediction markets guess the outcomes of the midterms. What we do know is this: the steel industry has experienced its share of tricks and treats over the past few months. Below are a few notable steel tricks and treats this Halloween season.

    Leibowitz: The dilemmas facing primary aluminum and BOF steel

    Earlier this month, retired General David Petraeus, whose resume is as impressive as any I’ve seen, held a fireside chat at the National Press Club with Century Aluminum CEO Jesse Gary and Mark Duffy, the president and CEO of the American Primary Aluminum Association. During that widely reported chat, retired Gen. Petraeus stated that the US was not militarily ready for a conflict. Because the event concentrated on aluminum, and primary aluminum at that, his remarks hit harder than I think the full facts warrant.

    Canada, Ontario commit billions to steel and automotive industries

    The Canadian federal government and the Ontario provincial government have announced five-year commitments totaling CA$5.22 billion (US$3.72 billion) for a Joint Steel Action Fund. That funding comes alongside up to an additional CA$2.5 billion over two years for large-scale automotive capital projects. The federal and provincial governments said the package is intended to support domestic steel production, automotive manufacturing, and the transition to connected and electric vehicles.

    Commerce lowers Mexico’s dumping rate in CORE case

    The US Department of Commerce has reduced the anti-dumping duty on corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) for some Mexican producers after a court order. On remand from the Court of International Trade (CIT), Commerce agreed that the record did not show that Galvasid SA de CV’s US customers separately negotiated or paid freight or insurance. The agency therefore removed the adjustment and recalculated the margin. As a result, the agency lowered Galvasid’s coated steel dumping rate to 14.54%, from 24.05%. The all-others rate is now 14.29%, down from 17.42%. Ternium’s rate is unchanged at 14.17%.