Trade Cases

SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Written by Stephanie Ritenbaugh
April 17, 2025
Fewer people think President Donald Trump’s trade policies are helping their business. And a majority of our respondents think it’s too early to say whether the tariffs are going to bring more manufacturing to the US, according to SMU’s most recent survey data.
The survey found that about 50% of respondents said Trump’s tariffs were not supporting their operations vs. 45% two weeks earlier. Uncertainty remained the same from two weeks ago, with 36% saying they were unsure.
Still, some folks – about 13% – believe that trade will work out better in the future once the dust settles. But that’s down from 19% in our last survey.
Remarks on tariffs
Here are responses to the question: Are President Trump’s tariff policies helping your business? Why or why not?
“A rising tide lifts all boats, but said tide appears to be receding.“
“Customers simply do not know how to forecast or project sales due to the uncertainty of the market and the on again off again tariffs.“
“Automotive market is very integrated in USA, CAN and MEX.”
“I went from ‘Yes’ to ‘I’m not sure’ to ‘No’ on this question in the past few months. The tariffs have unintentionally forced everyone to press ‘PAUSE’ on CapEx spends. Not what we wanted.”
“We use and NEED imported steel.”
“Still too volatile to figure it out.”
“Steel prices are higher due to his actions.”
“Getting more for my steel because mills raised prices.”
“They bring confusion and uncertainty.”
“Disrupting a bit, making some things a bit harder, but overall much better especially solidifying prices.”
“When prices go up, everyone, yes, everyone, does better.“
“Uncertainty depresses demand. And they are poorly thought out.”
“Wind changes direction so quickly. No stability/organization.“
“Recession fears stopping customers from buying.”
“They are hurting us now with steel costs and uncertainty in the market, but we remain hopeful they will help us in the future.”
“We cannot pass on increases.”
“Fundamentally irrational economic policy.”
“Needs to set reasonable and logical tariffs and then leave everything alone instead.”
“Hurting. Scrap is free to come in tariff free. Thus, all supply is focused on North America.“
“Too much chaos.”
“Short term no, due to uncertainty but long term yes.”

Wait and see
When it comes to reshoring, the survey found that most people – nearly 60% – believe it’s too early to say whether Trump’s taxes on goods will incentivize more companies to move their operations to the US to avoid costs. Another 26% don’t think the recent policy announcements will bring manufacturing back. About 15% are in favor of the policy’s stated goals.
Remarks on reshoring
Here’s how they answered the question: “Are you seeing evidence of manufacturing reshoring to the US because of Trump’s tariffs? If yes, where? If no, why not?”
“Small pockets of quote activity/evaluating domestic supply chains, but no firm orders.”
“If it happens it will take years…”
“Many of our US customers are talking about it but we have not seen any evidence as of yet.”
“We are quoting parts to bring back into the USA.”
“You can’t reshore or nearshore overnight, this is a silly question.”
“We’re seeing some headlines supporting both the ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ here. I just think it is too early at this point.”
“That takes years. For some industries they can shift production to US plants (automotive) but it is going to devastate business in general. We don’t have the cost and employment to reshoring the majority of what we import.”
“A lot of talk. We’ll see how many billions actually reshore.”
“Some RFQs coming in, but no one knows what to expect.”
“This will take years and the labor skills are not available.”
“Americans won’t want the jobs being done by offshore. Also, chasing manufacturing jobs is nonsense as the majority of manufacturing jobs will not exist in 10-15 years (think automation).”
“You can’t reopen or build manufacturing overnight. Will take years to see true impact and results.”
“Foundries and other heavy items are being reshored to save on transit and tariffs.”


Stephanie Ritenbaugh
Read more from Stephanie RitenbaughLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.