Trade Cases
Canada Considering Safeguards on Steel Imports
Written by Sandy Williams
August 17, 2018
Canada is considering provisional safeguard measures on seven classes of steel imports to prevent foreign steel shipments from being diverted into Canada as a result of U.S. trade actions.
“We know that because of the unfair tariffs imposed by the United States, other countries will be seeking alternative markets for their steel products,” said Canadian Finance Minister Bill Morneau. “Canada is now at risk for a surge in imports of steel products, which could harm Canadian steel producers and workers. From our perspective this is just unacceptable.”
“Our government believes the tariffs levied by the United States represent an exceptional circumstance, and that’s why provisional safeguards are being considered,” said Morneau.
Statistics Canada reports iron and steel imports surged year-over-year in second-quarter 2018, especially from Brazil, Turkey and India.
Morneau said a 15-day consultation period, ending Aug. 29, will investigate whether certain steel imports are harming or threatening to harm Canadian producers. If a negative impact is found, tariffs and/or quotas may be imposed. The European Union has already implemented similar measures.
The categories subject to the potential provisional safeguards are: steel plate, rebar, energy tubular products, hot-rolled sheet, prepainted steel, stainless steel wire and wire rod.
Canadian steel producers would prefer to “return to a situation where there’s fair trade in steel,” said Joseph Galimberti, president of the Canadian Steel Producers Association. Measures taken by other countries are forcing Canada to respond, he said. “The government has to take similar steps to protect Canadian producers or face pretty serious consequences as a result of global diversion.”
Importers and fabricators fear that imposing safeguards will limit steel supply and drive costs even higher. Tom Whalen, CEO of the Petroleum Services Association of Canada, said companies that are hurt by the safeguards should receive compensation from Ottawa.
“If you’re building equipment, you’re going to use bits and pieces of pretty much all [the affected steel categories],” said Whalen.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.
Global steel forum sets 2026 framework deadline as US ups pressure on excess capacity
Global steelmakers sounded the alarm Friday over the deepening excess steelmaking capacity crisis. Ministers at the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) in Gqeberha, South Africa, pledged to...
CRU: China’s indirect steel exports find new destination markets
The boom in China’s direct steel exports has not stopped this year, even with a rise in protectionist measures globally. The increase is driven by...
U.S. Steel sues Algoma over iron pellet shipments
U.S. Steel is suing Algoma over the Canadian flat-rolled producer's rejection of iron pellet shipments, arguing it has breached its contract.