Trade Cases
USW Opposes Lifting of Canadian Safeguards on Steel Imports
Written by Sandy Williams
April 28, 2019
Canada will keep safeguard tariffs on imports of heavy plate and stainless steel wire—only two products of the original seven provisional safeguards implemented in October. In April, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal found that imports of hot-rolled steel, pre-painted steel, energy tubular products, rebar and wire rod did not pose a threat of “serious injury” to the domestic industry and recommended that the trade measures be removed on those products.
The Canadian United Steelworkers strenuously oppose terminating the five provisional safeguards.
“This government must not abandon Canadian workers and communities in their hour of need,” said USW National Director Ken Neumann. “Thousands of jobs across the country are now at risk due to the Trudeau government’s failure to maintain safeguards protecting Canada’s steel sector from a surge in foreign imports.”
Neumann says the safeguards were effective in supporting Canada’s steel sector during the last six months and noted that countries around the world have taken similar measures to protect their markets and workers.
“Even with the safeguards in place, market conditions in Canada have deteriorated and approximately 700 of our members have already been laid off,” he said.
The government is launching a 30-day consultation period with businesses to determine whether other protections are required. Neumann says that although the USW will participate, it may be “too little, too late” to avoid a surge in foreign imports.
Removal of the provisional safeguards is also thought to weaken Canada’s position in negotiating the lifting of the Section 232 tariffs imposed on Canadian steel by the U.S.
“We’ve been working tirelessly on both sides of the border to resolve the tariffs issue, but the U.S. administration remains concerned that Canada would appear to be either unwilling or unable to protect its steel market,” said Leo W. Gerard, USW International President.
Removal of the safeguards will also deter investment by Canada’s steel producers, said Neumann.
“Even with the government’s support for investment in the industry, steel companies are not going to invest in their Canadian facilities if Canada does not protect its market,” he said.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.