Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: Supreme Court Declines Case Challenging Section 232—For Now
Written by Lewis Leibowitz
June 25, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
The lawsuit filed almost exactly one year ago challenging Section 232 has been turned down by the Supreme Court. AIIS and the other plaintiffs in the case, which was decided in favor of the government last March, asked the Supreme Court to grant an extraordinary petition to take the case before the normally required appellate review (in this case, by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Without comment, the Supreme Court denied the petition yesterday.
The Court’s refusal to push the process is hardly a surprise. While the Supreme Court has the authority to take a case prior to normal appellate review, it very rarely does so. U.S. v. Nixon, the famous “Nixon tapes” case, is one that comes to mind. But that was indeed extraordinary.
The denial of the petition by itself only means that the case will take longer to reach the Supreme Court. None of the Justices explained the Court’s decision—that is customary. Therefore, the denial is not a comment on the merits of the case. Moreover, the decision in the Gundy case, which I mentioned a couple of days ago, clearly suggests that the issue of unconstitutional “delegation” of legislative power is a very current issue with the Court.
It is probably fruitless to speculate on anything but the timing of the case. For those who were hoping for the steel tariffs to go away soon, those hopes are likely to be frustrated by this case. The Court of Appeals decision will take the better part of a year to reach a conclusion. If the Court of Appeals concludes that binding Supreme Court precedent controls the constitutional issue, the Supreme Court will get another crack at the case. And, if the Court of Appeals finds that the 1976 case of Algonquin is not controlling precedent, the government surely will appeal that decision to the Supreme Court. By the time the high court decides the case, the 2020 election is likely to be over.
In the meantime, it will be worth following the litigation over 232. No telling what might happen.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Lewis Leibowitz
Read more from Lewis LeibowitzLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz on trade: Trump’s reciprocal tariffs face mounting legal challenges
The tariffs amount to a wholesale transformation of US trade policy from one promoting increasing international interaction to one of restricting trade to serve national strategic goals.
Steel groups voice different takes on US-EU trade deal
US and European steel trade groups were at odds over their reaction to the recent trade deal President Trump brokered with the EU.
Here’s what’s up next in the big coated steel trade case
Attorneys representing domestic petitioners and foreign respondent companies have been busy filing case briefings and making rebuttals as the corrosion-resistant steel unfair trade investigations begin to wind down.
Price: Which countries get a ‘zonk’ in Trump’s primetime ‘Let’s Make a (Trade) Deal’ show?
As the president’s August 1 tariff deadline approaches, the “Let’s Make a Deal” game show returns to primetime (the Monty Hall version, of course). As the administration begins rolling out trade deals, we are starting to see what’s behind door number one and who is getting a “zonk.”
Trump says Canada deal might not happen: Report
President Trump said a negotiated deal with Canada might not occur, and all existing tariffs, along with those set to take effect soon, will stay in place, according to media reports.