Steel Products Prices North America

Other Mills to Stick with Index-based Contracts
Written by Tim Triplett
August 27, 2019
U.S. Steel raised industry eyebrows earlier this month when it informed its U.S. sales force that it would no longer use index-based pricing effective with its 2020 contracts. Would other mills climb on the bandwagon? And if so, what might that mean for steel prices?
Based on comments from chief executives of other industry-leading mills, it appears there will be plenty of legroom on the bandwagon. U.S. Steel may find itself alone for the ride.
All four executives on the mill panel earlier today at SMU’s Steel Summit in Atlanta said they would continue to entertain index-based pricing if that’s what customers want.
Basing contracts on a variety of indices is a common way of doing business in the industry. Many prior spot buyers have moved to index-based contracts for the ease of business, if nothing else, said Mark Millett, president and CEO of Steel Dynamics Inc. “We are not following suit [with U.S. Steel].”
“We have a variety of ways to price contracts depending on the customer and their needs. We will continue to work with our customers very closely,” said Ladd Hall, Nucor executive vice president.
John Hritz, president and CEO of JSW USA, added: “We are eager for long-term contracts. I don’t care if they are index-based or not. We will try to put contracts in place so they are as win-win as possible. I don’t know why you would throw any concept out; it doesn’t make sense to me.”
Cesar Jimenez, CEO of Ternium, Mexico, echoed the other panelists’ sentiments.
Explaining its reasoning in the letter to its sales force, U.S. Steel said: “A significant portion of the flat rolled market which now transacts under these price adjustable contracts is being drive by spot market transactions which are only a minute fraction of the total market. This often serves to distort the economics of these volume-based agreements.
“Transaction by transaction discussions and/or monthly negotiations used to be a staple in our business relationships, not to mention quarterly, semi-annual and annual fixed-price agreements, and we are prepared to utilize any of these options while also satisfying the volume needs of our customers over a defined period,” the company said.

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Steel Products Prices North America

SMU Price Ranges: HR crawls back to $800/ton
SMU’s HR price stands at $800/st on average, up $5/st from last week. The modest gain came as the low end of our range firmed, and despite the high end of our range declining slightly.

SMU successfully completes IOSCO review
SMU has successfully completed an external review of all our prices. The review has concluded that they algin with principles set by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).

Domestic plate prices could heat up despite so-so demand, market sources say
Some sources also speculated that plate could see further price increases thanks to modest but steady demand, lower imports, mill maintenance outages, and end markets less immediately affected by tariff-related disruptions.

SMU Price Ranges: HR holds, galv slips amid competing market narratives
SMU’s sheet and plate prices see-sawed this week as hot-rolled (HR) coil prices held their ground while prices for galvanized product slipped.

Nucor carries $875/ton HR list price into week seven
Nucor is keeping hot-rolled (HR) coil prices unchanged again this week, according to its latest consumer spot price (CSP) notice issued on Monday, Oct. 6