Trade Cases
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Written by Laura Miller
September 6, 2024
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant flat-rolled steel.
The case’s petitioners, Steel Dynamics Inc. (SDI), Nucor, U.S. Steel, Wheeling-Nippon Steel, and the United Steelworkers (USW) union, filed the case on Sept. 5.
The case asserts that Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa have been dumping coated flat-rolled steel in the US at prices below market value.
The table below shows the dumping margins alleged in the petition reviewed by SMU.
| Country | Min. | Max. | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 45.5% | 51.35% | 48.42% |
| Brazil | 47.0% | 99.5% | 75.7% |
| Canada | 19.1% | 51.3% | 35.0% |
| Mexico | 26.67% | 41.08% | 34.16% |
| Netherlands | 12.8% | 20.6% | 15.6% |
| South Africa | 51.96% | 52.02% | 51.99% |
| Taiwan | – | – | 67.9% |
| Turkey | 9.4% | 24.47% | 16.39% |
| UAE | 76.96% | 78.41% | 77.68% |
| Vietnam | – | – | 158.83% |
The trade case petition also argues that producers in Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam have benefited from government subsidies.
Veteran trade attorney Roger Schagrin of Schagrin Associates and lead counsel for SDI and the USW told SMU, “While dumping cases require margin allegations, subsidy cases don’t.”
Subsidy cases “must contain evidence of the programs and use of the programs by foreign producers,” he said.
Petitioners believe they have laid out the evidence of those programs in their 9,000+ page case filing.
The Department of Commerce is tasked with determining the exact amounts of subsidies received during the period of investigation and then establishing the countervailable duty (CVD) rates.
The International Trade Commission (ITC) has scheduled a case hearing for Sept. 26 and its preliminary injury determination vote for Oct. 18.
Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect Mr. Schagrin’s position as lead counsel for two of the domestic petitioners, but not all.
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
US rebar producers seek import relief with new trade case
The four countries targeted for duties are currently the top offshore suppliers of rebar to the US market: Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam.
CRU Insight: A 50% S232 tariff will raise US steel prices and shift trade flows
This CRU Insight examines how the increase in Section 232 tariffs on steel to challenging levels will lead to significatively higher prices for end consumers in the US market.
Canacero hits out at new US steel tariffs
Mexican steel trade group Canacero has condemned the US’ actions of raising tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%.
It’s official: Trump proclamation doubles S232 on imported steel, aluminum to 50%
President Donald Trump on Tuesday evening signed a proclamation that officially doubled Section 232 tariffs on imported steel and aluminum from 25% to 50%. There was one exception: Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum from the United Kingdom will remain at 25%, according to a fact sheet published by the White House.
Cliffs CEO cheers higher S232. What’s next for Canada, Mexico, and automotive?
Cleveland-Cliffs Chairman, President and CEO Lourenco Goncalves offered full-throated support for Section 232 tariffs on imported steel being doubled to 50%. And the top executive of the Cleveland-based steelmaker said the steel industry wanted to see as few exceptions as possible to the tariffs.