• Skip to main content

    Analysis

    CRU: What will the US elections mean for economic policy?

    Written by Alex Tuckett & Veronika Akhmadieva


    SMU is pleased to share this Insight piece from CRU economists. You can visit the CRU website to learn about its global commodities research and analysis services.

    US 2024 presidential candidates Donald Trump and Kamala Harris offer contrasting visions for the future. Trump proposed universal tariffs and a strict stance on immigration, which would be highly inflationary. Harris’s preference for higher taxes and more regulation could create economic growth headwinds of their own. Both candidates proposed policies that would be supportive of the construction sector, and while Trump’s preference for lower taxes and deregulation can be supportive in the short term, Harris’s plans around green transition might better position the US economy over the medium to long term. This Insight explores the possible economic effects of each candidate’s agenda.

    Latest in Analysis

    Price on Trade: Milwaukee Framework is a step forward on steel excess capacity

    Members of the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) met in Wisconsin last week and unveiled an updated plan to combat market-distorting excess capacity. The Milwaukee Framework adds color to the 2017 “Berlin Principles.” It is also a positive step in the ongoing battle against global steel market distortions. However, the Framework is only a guidepost. It must be implemented correctly to make an impact as new problems loom.