Trade Cases
Trump refutes tariff pare-down report
Written by Laura Miller
January 6, 2025
The incoming Trump administration is reportedly considering paring back the president-elect’s plans for universal tariffs.
While imports of all products may not face tariffs after all, the administration is apparently still mulling them for sectors critical to the nation’s defense and national security – including steel and aluminum – according to the Washington Post.
Three anonymous sources close to the matter told the Post that Trump aides are reviewing alternative tariff arrangements, including levies on ‘critical imports’ from all countries.
While no final decisions have been made yet, “Preliminary discussions have largely focused on several key sectors that the Trump team wants to bring back to the United States,” the newspaper reported the sources as saying.
“Those include the defense industrial supply chain (through tariffs on steel, iron, aluminum and copper) … and energy production (batteries, rare earth minerals and even solar panels,” the Post wrote.
“The sector-based universal tariff is a little bit easier for everybody to stomach out the gate,” one source told the Post. “And it would still give CEOs a massive incentive to start making their products here.”
Trump says that’s “Fake News”
However, President-elect Trump quickly refuted the WaPo report.
“The story in the Washington Post, quoting so-called anonymous sources, which don’t exist, incorrectly states that my tariff policy will be pared back,” Trump said in a Jan. 6 post on Truth Social. “That is wrong. The Washington Post knows it’s wrong. It’s just another example of Fake News.”
Section 232 tariffs still in play
Recall that President Trump imposed Section 232 tariffs on imports of steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) in his first term. Some countries, like Canada and Mexico, were later excluded from the duties, while others, like Japan, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, negotiated for tariff rate quotas, and Argentina, Brazil, and South Korea have absolute quotas. Those are still in place.
From their start in 2018 through Oct. 30, 2024, US importers paid S232 taxes of $14.07 billion to import steel and $4.28 billion to import aluminum products, according to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data.
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.