Features

SMU Steel Demand Index still lags
Written by David Schollaert
July 30, 2025
SMU’s Steel Demand Index has remained in contraction, according to late July indicators. Though growth faded at a slightly slower pace, the slowdown remains largely in response to ongoing tariff uncertainty.
Following moderate declines since the back half of March, the index has undergone a slight recovery since dropping to its lowest reading in over a year in late June. The index fell out of expansion territory and has struggled to find its footing since mid-April.
The Steel Demand Index, compiled from our survey data, now stands at 42, up from 38.5 in early July, but off from a four-year high of 65.0 in late February.
Methodology
Derived from the market surveys SMU conducts every two weeks, the index compares lead times and demand to create a diffusion index. This index has historically preceded lead times. This is notable given that lead times are often seen as a leading indicator of steel price moves. An index score above 50 indicates rising demand, and a score below 50 suggests declining demand.
Figure 1 shows the nearly 13-year history of the index on the left and provides a closer look at the Steel Demand Index readings of the past two years on the right.

Rearview mirror analysis
Last year, demand slipped. Not all at once—just a slow, steady drop. Spot buying faltered and prices faded. The index sank into contraction and stayed there most of 2024.
Momentum accelerated at the start of the year, driving growth. But despite brief price spikes — driven by sudden price increases from mills — market conditions have stayed soft due to sluggish end-use demand.
A tale of shifting tariffs
Early optimism with the arrival of the new administration has faded after a reworked Section 232 tariff stirred the market. But a never-ending carousel of tariff uncertainty has curbed buying and lessened spot demand.
HR coil prices have seen a similar trend, reaching $950 per short ton (st) in early March, but have since ticked down repeatedly—now averaging $840/st, according to SMU’s latest check of the market on Tuesday, July 29.
Lead times remain below five weeks on average, now at 4.4 weeks in our latest assessment on July 23, down from 5.1 weeks on average just in early May.
For nearly a decade, SMU’s steel demand diffusion index has preceded moves in mill lead times (Figure 2), and SMU’s lead times have also been a leading indicator of flat-rolled steel prices, particularly for HRC (Figure 3).


Signals ahead
Demand is steady, but buying remains largely tied to contracts — in many cases, buyers are taking max volumes. But they appear to be unwilling to carry excess inventory, especially since Q1’s tariff-driven buying surge has passed.
We’ve seen a jump in mills willing to talk price, with sources telling SMU that mills are hungrier than they were 30-45 days ago. This is an indication order books are softer as we carry through the dead summer.
Prices are moving lower after a short-lived $50/st-bump in June when Section 232 tariffs were doubled. And while tariffs have helped set a floor for prices, downward pressure remains. The question now is when will they bottom?
Editor’s note
Demand, lead times, and prices are based on the average data from manufacturers and steel service centers participating in SMU’s market trends analysis surveys. Our demand and lead times do not predict prices but are leading indicators of overall market dynamics and potential pricing dynamics. Look to your mill rep for actual lead times and prices.

David Schollaert
Read more from David SchollaertLatest in Features

Final Thoughts
A scrap trader looks back fondly at blast furnace steelmaking.

SMU Price Ranges: Sheet prices tick lower, but floor remains high vs. ’24
Sheet prices slipped again this week amid discounting from certain mills and ongoing concerns about demand.

Steel groups voice different takes on US-EU trade deal
US and European steel trade groups were at odds over their reaction to the recent trade deal President Trump brokered with the EU.

Here’s what’s up next in the big coated steel trade case
Attorneys representing domestic petitioners and foreign respondent companies have been busy filing case briefings and making rebuttals as the corrosion-resistant steel unfair trade investigations begin to wind down.