Trade Cases
NAFTA Round Two: Rules of Origin
Written by Sandy Williams
September 5, 2017
Round two of NAFTA negotiations wound up today, with no resolution in sight. Among the many issues being debated, the topic of rules-of-origin is proving to be contentious for Canadian and Mexican negotiators, as well as auto producers.
U.S. negotiators are proposing that U.S. content in NAFTA-eligible vehicles be raised to between 35-50 percent, according to sources cited by Reuters. A lobbyist told Reuters that at least 35 percent content would be necessary to meet Trump administration requirements. “Anything less would not be a political victory” for Trump, the lobbyist said.
Any additional increase in U.S.-specific content is being met with resistance by automakers, which rely on automotive parts from all three of the NAFTA nations. A more creative solution to tracing origin could be achieved by acknowledging research and development as a contribution to the percentage of origin content. Most of the R&D for the U.S. auto industry is based in Detroit. Automakers would like to avoid expensive retooling and geographic shifts in parts manufacturing that could occur should origin rules be changed.
To be considered a NAFTA product, content origin must be must be at least 62.5 percent North American. Canadian labor leader Jerry Dias said Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross wants to increase that percentage “significantly.” A percentage of 70 to 80 percent has been suggested by the administration, according to World Trade Online.
The U.S. has proposed a December deadline for a renegotiation of the terms of the NAFTA agreement—before American midterm congressional elections and the Mexican presidential elections. Few believe the deadline can be accomplished given the lack of written details and firm policy statement by U.S. negotiators.
“Personally, I don’t think we can make a deal because we have been so badly taken advantage of,” Trump said Aug. 23 during a rally in in Arizona. “I think we’ll end up probably terminating NAFTA at some point.”
Whether that statement is bluff or a serious assertion is yet to be determined.
Negotiators will meet Sept. 23-27 for a third round of talks in Ottawa.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Is It Nippon Steel USA or a partnership? And what does that mean for imports?
The document makes clear that Nippon Steel, through Nippon Steel America, will have “100% ownership of [the] common stock.” So if you want to own an interest in U.S. Steel’s future success, you will need to buy shares in Nippon Steel on the Nikkei stock exchange. It certainly will not be in your domestic S&P 500 ETF.
CSPA, USW say Canadian government’s steel action ‘falls short’
CSPA, USW disappointed in Canadian government's actions on steel.
Canada, mirroring the US, plans to take harder line on imported steel and aluminum
The actions, which includes tariffs, are necessary to protect the Canadian market from global overcapacity. They are also needed because other countries have redirected material to Canada as a result of higher US tariffs, Carney said.
Industry cautiously optimistic despite lack of steel specifics in US-UK trade deal
Details of a new tariff-rate quota on US imports of British steel are lacking in the new US-UK trade deal.
Mexico shuts down steel importer amid trade talks
The Mexican government shut down two plants and warehouses operated by US-based LAU Industries.