Trade Cases
NAFTA Round Two: Rules of Origin
Written by Sandy Williams
September 5, 2017
Round two of NAFTA negotiations wound up today, with no resolution in sight. Among the many issues being debated, the topic of rules-of-origin is proving to be contentious for Canadian and Mexican negotiators, as well as auto producers.
U.S. negotiators are proposing that U.S. content in NAFTA-eligible vehicles be raised to between 35-50 percent, according to sources cited by Reuters. A lobbyist told Reuters that at least 35 percent content would be necessary to meet Trump administration requirements. “Anything less would not be a political victory” for Trump, the lobbyist said.
Any additional increase in U.S.-specific content is being met with resistance by automakers, which rely on automotive parts from all three of the NAFTA nations. A more creative solution to tracing origin could be achieved by acknowledging research and development as a contribution to the percentage of origin content. Most of the R&D for the U.S. auto industry is based in Detroit. Automakers would like to avoid expensive retooling and geographic shifts in parts manufacturing that could occur should origin rules be changed.
To be considered a NAFTA product, content origin must be must be at least 62.5 percent North American. Canadian labor leader Jerry Dias said Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross wants to increase that percentage “significantly.” A percentage of 70 to 80 percent has been suggested by the administration, according to World Trade Online.
The U.S. has proposed a December deadline for a renegotiation of the terms of the NAFTA agreement—before American midterm congressional elections and the Mexican presidential elections. Few believe the deadline can be accomplished given the lack of written details and firm policy statement by U.S. negotiators.
“Personally, I don’t think we can make a deal because we have been so badly taken advantage of,” Trump said Aug. 23 during a rally in in Arizona. “I think we’ll end up probably terminating NAFTA at some point.”
Whether that statement is bluff or a serious assertion is yet to be determined.
Negotiators will meet Sept. 23-27 for a third round of talks in Ottawa.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.
Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.
Steel Summit: Execs urge clarity on trade/tariff policy, want stronger USMCA
Tariff policy dominated the discussion of the SMU Steel Summit trade panel on Tuesday afternoon. The message was clear: uncertainty is rattling the steel supply chain.
Final AD/CVD margins announced in coated steel trade case
The Commerce Department announced the final anti-dumping and countervailing duty (CVD) margins in the sprawling trade case investigating corrosion-resistant steel imports.