Trade Cases
NAFTA Round Two: Rules of Origin
Written by Sandy Williams
September 5, 2017
Round two of NAFTA negotiations wound up today, with no resolution in sight. Among the many issues being debated, the topic of rules-of-origin is proving to be contentious for Canadian and Mexican negotiators, as well as auto producers.
U.S. negotiators are proposing that U.S. content in NAFTA-eligible vehicles be raised to between 35-50 percent, according to sources cited by Reuters. A lobbyist told Reuters that at least 35 percent content would be necessary to meet Trump administration requirements. “Anything less would not be a political victory” for Trump, the lobbyist said.
Any additional increase in U.S.-specific content is being met with resistance by automakers, which rely on automotive parts from all three of the NAFTA nations. A more creative solution to tracing origin could be achieved by acknowledging research and development as a contribution to the percentage of origin content. Most of the R&D for the U.S. auto industry is based in Detroit. Automakers would like to avoid expensive retooling and geographic shifts in parts manufacturing that could occur should origin rules be changed.
To be considered a NAFTA product, content origin must be must be at least 62.5 percent North American. Canadian labor leader Jerry Dias said Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross wants to increase that percentage “significantly.” A percentage of 70 to 80 percent has been suggested by the administration, according to World Trade Online.
The U.S. has proposed a December deadline for a renegotiation of the terms of the NAFTA agreement—before American midterm congressional elections and the Mexican presidential elections. Few believe the deadline can be accomplished given the lack of written details and firm policy statement by U.S. negotiators.
“Personally, I don’t think we can make a deal because we have been so badly taken advantage of,” Trump said Aug. 23 during a rally in in Arizona. “I think we’ll end up probably terminating NAFTA at some point.”
Whether that statement is bluff or a serious assertion is yet to be determined.
Negotiators will meet Sept. 23-27 for a third round of talks in Ottawa.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.