Trade Cases

Canada Holding Firm on NAFTA Requirements
Written by Sandy Williams
September 6, 2018
Canada is back in the NAFTA negotiations, but dispute settlement and cultural exemptions continue to be sticking points for a new agreement.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has stressed that Canada will hold firm on requiring a dispute resolution mechanism like Chapter 19.
“As I’ve said, we will not sign a deal that is bad for Canadians,” said Trudeau in a press conference Tuesday. “And, quite frankly, not having a Chapter 19 to ensure that the rules are followed would be bad for Canadians.”
The cultural exemption would preserve what Canada considers “cultural industries” such as preventing American networks from buying Canadian media affiliates.
“It would be a giving up of our sovereignty and our identity and that is something that we simply will not accept,” Trudeau added. “So, we’ve made it very clear that defending that cultural exemption is something that is fundamental to Canadians. Again, we will not sign a deal that is bad for Canada and, quite frankly, eliminating a cultural exemption would be bad for Canadians.”
Canadian union Unifor sides with Trudeau on both measures and emphasized the need for a trade dispute mechanism with the United States. Said Jerry Dias, national president of Unifor, “Would anybody sign a deal with the Trump administration without a clause that says we can appear before independent arbitrators to get a fair shake? I mean, really?”
Trudeau said he would consider more flexible trade measures for dairy products, but will not cross the “red line” on trade dispute and cultural exemptions. Canadian tariffs on dairy products from the U.S. have been a source of frustration for President Trump.
Trump called the negotiations “very intense” with Canada. “We’ll see how it works out. If it doesn’t work out, that’s going to be fine for the country, for our country,” he said. “It won’t be fine for Canada. But we love Canada, they’re our next-door neighbor, we’ve had a great relationship with them for many, many years.”
Trump told Republican congressional leaders on Wednesday that he expects a deal with Canada in the next two to three days.
“We’ll see how it all works out,” Trump said. “We don’t want NAFTA. NAFTA has been very bad for our country. But we’ll have a trade bill.”
Last week, Trump warned Congress on Twitter not to interfere with NAFTA negotiations “or I will simply terminate NAFTA and we will be far better off.”
Congress has complained that it has not been consulted in the negotiations and reiterated the need for a trilateral agreement rather than moving ahead with the bilateral agreement with Mexico.

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.

Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.