Steel Markets
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/28bfc2dc179935d7c49ba64649a2f93a.jpg)
ATA Pleads Urgency for Infrastructure Spending
Written by Sandy Williams
February 7, 2020
The American Trucking Association appealed for the implementation of a fuel tax to support highway and border infrastructure during recent testimony in Washington by President and CEO Chris Spear.
“The fuel tax is the most immediate, cost-efficient and conservative mechanism currently available for funding surface transportation projects and programs. Collection costs are less than 1 percent of revenue,” said Spear in testimony on Thursday before the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade.
“There is a perception that the fuel tax is no longer a viable revenue source due to the availability of electric vehicles and improvements in vehicle fuel efficiency. This notion is belied by the facts. According to the Congressional Budget Office’s latest estimates, revenue from fuel taxes will drop 5 percent over the next decade, or about $2 billion. A modest increase in the fuel tax, or a new fee on alternative fuel vehicles, can easily recover these lost revenues.”
The Build America Fund proposed by ATA would be supported with a new 20 cent per gallon fee on transportation fuels that would be phased in over four years. ATA estimates the fuel tax would generate nearly $340 billion over the first 10 years and cost the average passenger vehicle driver about $100 per year. In addition, ATA supports a fee on hybrid and electric vehicles that use reduced or no traditional fuels.
The need for improving the nation’s highways, bridges and ports is critical to safety and the economy. Freight tonnage is projected to grow by 23 percent during the next decade and the trucking industry will be tasked with hauling 2.4 billion more tons of freight than it moved in 2019, said Spear. Part of that tonnage will come from increased commerce under the USMCA. The new trade agreement is expected to boost trade with Canada and Mexico by 5 percent, or $68.1 billion annually.
A major portion of U.S. commerce is conducted through the nation’s ports, which will need government support to correct inefficiencies. A study by the Commerce Department found that delays at ports are costing the U.S. economy as much as $5.8 billion annually. Volume growth at U.S. ports has caused an increase in wait times for trucks to have cargo loaded.
“The underlying tenet of the relationship between ports and the trucking industry is—the faster the cargo and containers can be arranged for pickup by the motor carrier at the ports, the more efficient the ports and the trucking industry will be,” said Spear. “If all of the moving parts are not working in unison, including labor, the operation of equipment at the ports, and the arrangement of the container for the truck to pick up, efficiencies will decrease.”
Congestion on the nation’s intermodal connecting roads cause more than a million hours of delay annually for the construction industry. Poorly maintained roads add further delays and safety concerns for drivers and also cause damage to vehicles and the freight they carry.
“A first-world economy cannot survive a third-world infrastructure system. The federal government has a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the resources are available to address this self-imposed and completely solvable situation,” said Spear. “The Commerce Clause does not represent an antiquated 18th century ideal; it is what binds us a nation. E Pluribus Unum – out of many, one.”
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/sandy-williams.jpeg)
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Markets
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/GrafTech.jpg)
GrafTech’s Q2 loss widens in ‘challenging’ business environment
GrafTech cited a “challenging” part of the business cycle as its net loss widened in the second quarter.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/07/CRU-Logo-2023-07-21-at-4.35.41-PM.png)
CRU: Poor steel margins continue to push down raw material prices
Both iron ore and coking coal prices fell this week because of resistance from buyers. Iron ore prices have continued to fall throughout the past week, following sharp declines in steel prices in China, given no new policy announcement from the ‘Third Plenum’ meeting.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/06/canacero-logo.png)
Op-Ed: The myth of the Mexican steel surge
We have heard ominous warnings about a flood of Mexican steel threatening the US market. It's the kind of rhetoric that gets thrown around often with little regard for the facts. The reality is that the Mexican steel surge is simply not happening, and the US steel industry has consistently maintained a significant trade surplus in finished products with Mexico. In 2023 alone, this surplus exceeded $3 billion.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/07/CRU-Logo-2023-07-21-at-4.35.41-PM.png)
CRU: Demand weakness continues to weigh on global sheet markets
Demand has remained persistently weak across the globe for sheet steel, weighing on prices. US HR coil prices fell the furthest this week as high-volume, low-priced deals were transacted as mills looked to fill order books and competed with one another amid relative demand weakness. Meanwhile, European prices were also down due to low demand […]
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/graph_up_arrow.png)
Influx of coated products fuels recent import surge
Steel imports fell back in May from April’s recent high but remained elevated compared to the levels seen over the past year. A deeper dive into the data confirms what SMU has been hearing from sources: Coated sheet is driving the recent rise in overall import levels.