Steel Mills
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/d0caca029a2ef5978d0f9dfff1003936.jpg)
ATI Workers Considering Strike Option
Written by Sandy Williams
March 2, 2021
United Steelworkers at Allegheny Technologies Inc. are preparing for a potential strike as contract negotiations break down at the bargaining table.
USW members have been working under a one-year contract extension after January 2020 negotiations were halted due to the impact and uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The extended contract expired last week on Feb. 28.
Contract negotiations have been ongoing since January 2021, but failed to reach an agreement by the contract termination date. With an impasse in negotiations, the USW bargaining committee is now calling for a strike authorization vote.
A strike would affect about 1,300 workers at nine ATI locations. Both sides are working to avert such action, but the USW committee wants to be ready to begin a strike if necessary. “We plan to return to bargaining with the hope that ATI will finally see that its confrontational bargaining strategy won’t work,” said the union in an update to members.
“While the contract expired at 11:59 p.m. on Feb. 28, 2021, both parties agreed to extend their labor agreement indefinitely under the terms of the expired contract,” said ATI spokesperson Natalie Gillespie. “ATI and the USW are working hard to reach resolution. We value our employees’ hard work and commitment, and our proposal reflects that.”
Disputed issues include wages, health insurance, contracting out protections, overtime pay and scheduling. The union is asking for a three-year contract as opposed to a four-year agreement offered by ATI.
Workers have not had a wage increase in seven years, but have had lump-sum payments and profit sharing during the period. ATI is proposing $2,500 upon ratification, a 2% raise in 2022, $1,000 in 2023, and 2% in 2024. The USW has countered with a 4% increase in 2021, 3.5% in 2022, and 3.5% in 2023 as well as a $4,000 signing bonus.
Company-proposed health coverage would increase annual deductibles from $300 per individual and $600 per family to $500 and $1,000. The proposal would raise monthly premiums from zero to $40 for an individual or $125 for a family plan beginning in year three and increase co-pays.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/sandy-williams.jpeg)
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Mills
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/Nucor.png)
Nucor lowers 2024 output estimate for Brandenburg plate mill
Nucor has lowered the 2024 production estimate for its Brandenburg, Ky., plate mill due to soft market conditions.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/SSAB.png)
SSAB adjusts output in weak Q3, readies for Q4 rebound
SSAB said lower plate prices in the US were the primary reason for reduced results in the second quarter. With a dismal Q3 outlook, the Swedish steelmaker is adjusting production across its facilities. That includes moving up its annual US mill outage in anticipation of a better Q4. SSAB Americas Revenues in the Americas segment […]
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/Nucor.png)
Topalian puts focus on “unfair” trade, eyes USMCA partners
Nucor’s top executive expressed concerns over unfair trade practices, highlighting increased steel imports from Mexico and Canada.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/Cliffs_logo2.2.png)
Cliffs sees close of Stelco buy, bottom to steel tags, and Mexico out of USMCA
Cleveland-Cliffs expects its acquisition of Canada’s Stelco to close later this year, which will help the the Cleveland-based steelmaker as a bottom to steel tags nears.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/Nucor.png)
Nucor posts lower Q2 earnings, predicts tough Q3 too
Nucor recording lower second quarter earnings on falling steel prices. And the Charlotte, N.C.-based predicted that profits would be lower still in the third quarter, primarily because of weaker results from its steel mills divisions.