Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
Written by Becca Moczygemba
February 23, 2023
Last week I talked about lead times and price increases. After the week we’ve had, I could easily copy and paste the same sentiments. (Although I don’t think I’m allowed to publish some of what I’ve heard lately.)
Aside from the obvious reasons, price increases come with some extra baggage for many organizations.
A few days ago I came across the topic of specification (spec) changes. I recall spec changes being the bane of my existence at one point.
Maybe the cut-to-length and slitting sizes change. Or perhaps they want a light-stone paint color instead of burnished slate. Is it really that big of an issue? Not really. However, when you start changing substrates, things can get sticky.
If you’re selling material to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), education is a good form of risk management. Sure, it’s easy enough to say “yes” to a customer. But when you consider the exposure, a simple “yes” may not be so simple down the road.
And maybe that’s the way it’s always been done. The customer asks for a change, so you say “yes” and ask questions later. But then you end up with aged inventory because the customer won’t take it. Or you can’t sell it off. And we all know aged material is even worse when it’s expensive too. As prices continue to climb, so does the future risk.
In relation to spec changes, nobody wants to sit on master coils they can’t use. Working closely with the OEM’s engineering team, and your own sales support team, can aid in maximizing output. Are they able to use the substrate that is already in stock until it’s gone? Can the material they’re moving away from be used for one of their other applications? What other efficiencies can be implemented into the spec change plan?
Ultimately, the goal is mitigating margin loss. Of course, there are nuances to every situation, and it’s not always that straight forward. But preparedness is key when your crystal ball is broken and you can’t see what prices are going to be from one day to the next. Especially when taking scrap prices into consideration. Nobody likes a useless drop cut.
By Becca Moczygemba, becca@steelmarketupdate.com
Becca Moczygemba
Read more from Becca MoczygembaLatest in Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
Next Monday marks the start of the second Trump administration. The limbo we’ve been living in since Election Day in early November will finally come to an end. What better way to take a look at what’s coming up in Washington, D.C., than a conversation with Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA) President Philip K. Bell. He […]
Final Thoughts
It’s another week of big headlines and ho-hum pricing moves – which is to say the start of 2025 is looking a lot like the end of 2024. Scrap has settled up $20 per gross ton (gt). Steel prices, however, were a soft sideways this week. Chalk it up to uneven demand and abundant supply. And while we’re not aware of any major outages, some of you tell us that you’ve lost some shipping days here and there because of the recent cold snap.
Final Thoughts
I wrote in a Final Thoughts a few years ago that it seemed all the swans were black. More recently, I’ve been asked by some of you what the wildcards are for 2025. You could probably make the case that all the cards are wild now.
Final Thoughts
SMU lets readers respond on their thoughts about President Joe Biden blocking Nippon's deal for U.S. Steel.
Final Thoughts
Some world-changing events happen in an instant. Others take many twists and turns. The outcome remains unknowable at every phase. That is, until you finally arrive at the end of the roller coaster, the safety bar lifts up, and you stagger off the ride. It appears such is the case with Japan’s Nippon’s Steel Corp.’s (NSC’s) proposed $14.9-billion buy of Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel. And the ride ain't over yet.