Steel Mills
A Contract Pendulum Swing Could Impact Mill Order Books
Written by John Packard
October 13, 2013
The following is an email we received from a service center executive regarding the current contract negotiations and their opinion as to how changes can change the mix of contracts to spot orders on with a mill and, price volatility in the marketplace. We have heard the same argument from others within the steel industry who believe the changes being requested by the domestic steel mills will create more volatility in the spot markets.
The pendulum has moved back and forth over the years, with the mills sometimes having majority contracts/lower spot books to sometimes having majority spot books/lower contracts. While the mills may be convinced (wrongly I believe) that the Index based pricing has been detrimental to their bottom lines, there likely were many benefits that came about as a result of the index model:
The market moved into one of the most stable periods in recent times. Efficiencies increased, predictive volumes allowed mills to plan and execute production better, mill on-time deliveries improved dramatically, end-users and service centers were able to reduce inventories since they were buying regular amounts each month. The need/want to take on speculative physical volumes to protect against a wild move up in price shrank away. As a result, volatility reduced significantly, and pricing became more stable – relative to the recent past.
And to the mills’ point that the Index-based model is negative for their bottom lines, mills (especially EAF producers) are making very good returns right now – with the Index-model very much still in place. Why is that? Oh, because fundamentals always dictate price: demand is steady, inventories are low, production was lost due to outages, and imports were relatively low. So, supply went down, demand held steady, and presto! Prices rose!
If the pendulum swings back to mills having majority Spot order books, they still won’t be able to control the price, but we will likely see a return to higher volatility, with bigger moves up and down, lost efficiencies, etc.
Steel Market Update welcomes your thoughts on the subject. You can email them to: John@SteelMarketUpdate.com
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills
CMC looks beyond Arizona micro-mill woes to long-term viability of construction mart
Despite the economic and geopolitical upheaval of the last five years, CMC President and CEO Peter Matt points out that the construction market has been an essential element of the way forward.
Cliffs slates layoffs at Minnesota mines due to excess iron ore supply
The temporary measures “are necessary to re-balance working capital needs and consume excess pellet inventory produced in 2024,” Cliffs told SMU.
Nucor guides to lower first-quarter results
Nucor anticipates showing an earnings decline when it releases its full first-quarter earnings report on Monday, April 28.
U.S. Steel anticipates a loss in first quarter
The Pittsburgh steelmaker expects to see increasing volumes from both Big River Steel and Big River 2.
CMC earnings fall on seasonal weakness, economy woes
CMC’s earnings tumbled in its fiscal second quarter on seasonal weakness and continued shakiness in the wider economy.