Steel Mills

USW Workers Rally for Fair Contract Settlements
Written by Sandy Williams
August 20, 2015
Union workers from US Steel and ArcelorMittal staged rallies and marches at locations across the country this week. Contract negotiations are stalled over concessions the companies want on health and retirement benefits.
Carrying signs and rallying to slogans like “United we bargain, divided we beg” and “No contract no peace,” thousands of USW members took to the streets to express their dissatisfaction with the contract proposals ArcelorMittal and US Steel have presented to union negotiators.
“We don’t anticipate a work stoppage, but if there is one we’re going to be prepared,” said Don Seifert of USW Local 1010 which represents workers at ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor. “As you can see, it’s not hard for us to organize and get people out. They’re talking about cutting benefits, and that’s part of our compensation package. For us to let that go is not right. We want to maintain our health care. We want to maintain benefits retirees have earned over the years. All we’re looking for is a fair and equitable contract.”
After working under the expired contract at Allegheny Technologies, talks ended after the union rebuffed the final offer by ATI. The company, subsequently, imposed a lock out on employees, a situation that some fear may happen at US Steel and/or ArcelorMittal.
ArcelorMittal and US Steel both seek to modify health and pension benefits to cut fixed costs and bring benefits in line with standards at other industries. Union members are reluctant to accept concessions on their first-class benefits packages.
The USW claims management is “attempting to use a temporary downturn in the domestic steel market as an excuse to permanently cut workers’ contract language and benefits.”
The contracts at the two companies cover about 30,000 employees and will expire on Sept. 1. The USW has issued notices to members at both companies explaining what happens during a strike or lockout.
There are four options if a new contract is not approved by the Sept 1 deadline.
1) The previous contract could be extended while negotiations continue (both parties must agree)
2) A strike could be called
3) Employees could continue to work without a contract
4) The company could lock out the employees.
“We recognize that this is a difficult time for the steel industry,” said USW International President Leo W. Gerard. “But we also recognize that for generations, these have been good, middle-class jobs that have allowed workers to care for their families and support their communities. It is important that we make sure that remains true for our generation and for those who come after us.”

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Mills

U.S. Steel sues Algoma over iron pellet shipments
U.S. Steel is suing Algoma over the Canadian flat-rolled producer's rejection of iron pellet shipments, arguing it has breached its contract.

August US mill shipments slip but still higher than last year
The American Iron and Steel Institute reported a decline in the monthly shipments of US mills from July to August.

TransPod, Algoma, Supreme Steel linkup anchors Canadian steel in high-speed transit build
The three Canadian companies have announced a strategic partnership to support the development of an ultra-high-speed transit line from Edmonton to Calgary.

Metallus, USW agree to tentative four-year labor deal
Metallus and the United Steelworkers (USW) have agreed to a tentative four-year labor contract.

ArcelorMittal Dofasco resumes cokemaking after emergency maintenance
The Canadian steelmaker reported on Sept. 30 that “urgent maintenance” was needed in its coke plant off-gas systems. The work required coke oven gas from the No. 2 coke plant to be flared for most of that week.