Trade Cases

Global Forum Report on Excess Steel Capacity Nearing Completion
Written by Sandy Williams
October 10, 2017
The Global Forum on excess steel capacity is getting closer to releasing its report. The Forum was convened after the G20 meetings in Paris and has outlined six key principles in a draft report that is circulating among 33 participating countries. Comments are due by Oct. 10 with a possible final draft delivered to G20 ministers on Nov. 17.
A draft obtained by Inside U.S. Trade says:
-
The overcapacity issue “requires the attention in a global format with broad participation of economies.” Goals should be set and published by the Forum if appropriate.
-
Market distorting subsidies and government support measures should not be endorsed, including subsidies that “sustain uneconomic steel plants, encourage investment in new steelmaking capacity which otherwise would not be built, facilitate exports of steel products, or otherwise distort competition by contributing to excess capacity.”
-
All types of mill ownership should be subject to the same regulations and rules in order to establish and maintain a fair playing field. “Irrespective of ownership, all enterprises acting in the steel market (whether privately owned or directly or indirectly owned, fully or in part, by their governments or by government-related entities) should not receive directly or indirectly subsidies or other type of support that distort competition by contributing to excess capacity, and should follow the same regulations with economic implications and rules, including bankruptcy procedures.”
-
Market-based outcomes in the steel industry should be prioritized: “Open and competitive markets and a market-driven approach to resource allocation based on the competitive positions of steel enterprises should be the driving forces of the steel sector. New investment, production and trade flows should reflect market-based supply and demand conditions.”
-
Capacity should be reduced by eliminating consistently unprofitable firms, “Zombie” firms, obsolete capacity, and those who are noncompliant on environment, quality and safety standards.
-
Governments should share information on steel capacity on a regular basis, updating information not less than three times per year.
Phillip Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association, attended the meeting in Paris and told reporters on a media call on Monday that there has been “a lot progress on the report.” An important step, said Bell, was the collection of data from China that was individualized by region and mill rather than aggregated. He was unsure if the final report would be issued before or after a scheduled ministerial meeting on Nov. 30.

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: The UK trade agreement, a template for future trade deals?
The UK deal may signal relaxation of the heaviest tariffs. The suspension of the reciprocal tariffs greater than 10% - remember, 57 countries were hit with that - ends on July 9. But it could be extended. If more deals like the one with the UK are struck, the suspensions may continue to permit more agreements - relieving global markets of considerable worry.

US, UK reach trade deal that includes Section 232 ‘alternative’
The US and UK governments have announced a trade deal in which an “alternative” to the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs will be provided.

US pols urge ‘domestically owned’ steel industry
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.

Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.

Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.