Trade Cases
WTO Sides with Korea on OCTG Duties
Written by Sandy Williams
November 15, 2017
A dispute over OCTG dumping duties assigned by the U.S. on imports of Korean OCTG drew mixed conclusions from a World Trade Organization dispute panel.
The WTO sided with South Korea on claims that the U.S. violated rules in the Antidumping Agreement regarding the calculation of fair value of OCTG. The panel determined that Commerce did not use data pertaining to sales of a like product from the home market of Korea to determine the value of the product. Commerce excluded line pipe and standard pipe, which Korea claimed is the same like-category as OCTG, and instead made its comparison to profit data from a multinational corporation outside of Korea.
The WTO, however, rejected Korea’s arguments regarding Commerce’s viability test and other procedural and methodology issues.
The WTO recommended that “the United States bring its measures into conformity with its obligations under the Antidumping Agreement.” Both parties have 60 days to appeal the decision.
Korean steel producers are continuing to pursue a suit with the U.S. Court of International Trade after Commerce exercised its authority in April 2017 to address market distortions by employing Section 504 of the Trade Preference Extension Act of 2015. Section 504 allows Commerce to disregard foreign cost of production in calculating antidumping duties if it determines that a “particular market situation” exists that does not reflect the cost of production in ordinary trade. Commerce included electricity subsidies in its evaluation of price distortion.
Duties were raised to a range of 2.76 to 24.92 percent from previously assigned duties of 4.0 to 6.5 percent. Final duties were assigned as follows: 24.92 percent on OCTG imports from Nexteel, 2.76 percent on SeAH Steel, and 13.84 percent on Hyundai Steel and other South Korean steelmakers.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
President Trump’s tariff letters maintain ‘Sectoral Tariffs’
Form letters sent to Japan and South Korea’s leaders stating that US President Donald Trump plans to apply 25% tariffs on goods from each nation beginning on Aug. 1 are not applicable to steel or aluminum imports.
Steel groups welcome passage of budget bill
Steel trade groups praised the passage of the Big Beautiful Bill (BBB) in Congress on Thursday.
Canada moves to curb steel imports with TRQs
Canada has implemented tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) on steel imports to help stabilize its domestic market.
Commerce launches probe into unfairly traded rebar imports
Here are the details and a case timeline for the rebar trade case recently initiated by the Commerce Department.
Leibowitz on Trade: Who is winning the tariff debate?
Most economists will tell you that universal tariffs will result in inflation and reduce demand, causing a recession or worse. (After all, this is what happened in the 1930s). It is a rare product that is so essential that demand will not go down if prices go up.