Trade Cases
Currency Manipulation to Be Subject to Countervailing Duties
Written by Sandy Williams
February 5, 2020
A new regulation from the U.S. Department of Commerce allows currency manipulation by foreign governments to be considered a subsidy subject to countervailing duties.
“This Currency Rule is an important step in ensuring that unfair trade practices are properly remedied,” said Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross. “While successive administrations have balked at countervailing foreign currency subsidies, the Trump administration is taking action to level the playing field for American businesses and workers.”
A countervailable subsidy is defined by Commerce as a “financial contribution from a government or public entity that is specific and provides a benefit to a foreign producer or exporter.”
The new regulation identifies certain criteria that Commerce would use to determine if countervailing duties should be imposed in cases of currency under-valuation.
“In assessing whether there has been such government action, Commerce will not normally include monetary and related credit policy of an independent central bank or monetary authority,” said the Department. “Commerce will seek and generally defer to Treasury’s expertise in currency matters.”
Currently, Commerce maintains 515 antidumping and countervailing duty orders on a variety of products. During the Trump administration, 198 antidumping and countervailing duty investigations were initiated, up from 168 percent from the comparable period in the Obama administration.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.