Steel Mills

Would Anti-Dumping Move Your Company to Buy More Domestic Steel?
Written by John Packard
June 9, 2015
Steel Market Update conducted our flat rolled steel analysis (survey) last week. We began the process on Monday (June 1st) and approximately 90 percent of the responses were made prior to the filing of the anti-dumping and countervailing duty suit on corrosion-resistant steel (galvanized, Galvalume, galvanneal, aluminized, etc.).
We invited approximately 600 companies to participate which is normal for one of our questionnaires. Of the companies who responded, 47 percent were manufacturing companies, 34 percent were service centers, 9 percent were trading companies, 6 percent steel mills and 4 percent were toll processors.
One of the questions asked early in the survey process was if any anti-dumping filing would impact the company’s buying patterns and move them to purchase more domestic steel. Sixty percent of the respondents reported that it would not make a difference while 40 percent indicated that they would increase the volume of purchases with the domestic steel mills.
This question received a large number of comments and we thought our readers would be interested in seeing what a portion of our respondents had to say on the subject (especially when you consider that these responses were made literally hours before the AD/CVD suit was filed):
“Yes, we will buy more domestically, but we are actively pursuing other offshore supply chains. If domestic prices stay low, we may be able to buy at home.” Manufacturing company
“That is obvious. It will also depend on what other countries are available to import to U.S.” Service center
“Buying very little foreign already.” Service center
“We are only purchasing foreign where necessary based on product requirements, we are not buying generic foreign based on price.” Service center
“A lot of unknown at this point to fully answer but I do see this having some impact on our buying patterns.” Manufacturing company
“Filing itself will not likely, but this would impact pricing at some point, which would then impact our buying in a more domestic direction.” Manufacturing company (Canada)
“Yes – With most of our material purchased from service centers we would be forced to buy more steel as they would be able to justify a significant price increase due to new ‘reactive’ demand.” HVAC Wholesaler
“We have simply shifted our purchases to non targeted foreign suppliers.” Service center
“Our company was not buying much foreign material anyway. It will just raise prices in the US market and keep domestic manufacturers less competitive in a world market.” Manufacturing company
“We are heavily import still (non-NAFTA) on CR and GALV products. We would have to buy more domestic steel as well as shift some CR buying to Mexico.” Manufacturer
“Will I have a choice? I have to buy as competitively as I can. Will probably move more to our Mexico plant who will be able to get the foreign steel at a much better price.” Manufacturing company
“Head off foreign purchases. Depends on how widespread the filing is.” Manufacturing company
“On light gauge especially.” Trading company
“N/A- domestic mill. Purchasers would buy more domestic if a suit is filed though.” Steel mill

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills

AISI: April mill shipments fall, sheet down YTD
US steel mills saw a decline in shipments from March to April.

Hybar rolls first rebar, ramping up Arkansas mill commissioning
The startup steelmaker produced its first rebar at its greenfield steel mill in Osceola, Ark., marking a key milestone by completing construction in 22 months.

Goncalves: Despite higher tariffs, two Cliffs mills to remain idled
Cleveland-Cliffs Chairman, President, and CEO Lourenco Goncalves said he would keep one mill idled and still plans to idle another despite increased protections from Section 232 tariffs doubling to 50%.

Trump says Section 232 tariff on steel, aluminum to double to 50% at Pennsylvania rally celebrating Nippon-USS deal
At a rally celebrating a “planned partnership” between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel, President Trump announced higher tariffs on steel and aluminum imports into the United States, and revealed few more details on Nippon’s investment in USS’ operations.

CRU: Trump hails a partnership of Nippon with USS
In a social media post, President Donald Trump said a planned partnership between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel will add $14 billion to the US economy and ensure USS remains headquartered in Pittsburgh.