Global steel production in 12 months through June totaled 1.622 billion tonnes with a capacity of 2.2 billion tonnes. Capacity utilization on a three month moving average, (3MMA) basis was 71.6 percent, down from 72 percent in three months through May. China accounted for 50.8 percent of global production in June. Asia as a whole, including India, accounted for 68.2 percent.
Production in June on a tons/day basis was 4.374 million tonnes, down from 4.490 in May. Tons/day declined in both May and June. The seasonal pattern evident since the recession is different in 2015. Total June production was 135.594 million tonnes. If we look at the three month moving average and plot it over time, we see that there has been a significant decline in the second half of the year since and including 2010 which usually extends into February, after which production kicks up rapidly (Figure 1).
In 2015 the uptick was delayed until May and it is evident that the high point of 2014 won’t be reached this year. As production has increased each year since the recession, capacity utilization has decreased. The gap is widening and it has been estimated that surplus capacity is currently as much as 500 million tons per year, well over half of which is in China.
Table 1 shows global production broken down into regions and also the production of the top ten nations in the single month of June and their share of the global total. It also shows the latest three months and twelve months production through June with year over year growth rates for each.
Regions are shown in white font and individual nations in beige. If the three month growth rate exceeds the twelve month we interpret this to be a sign of positive momentum and accelerating growth. The world as a whole currently has negative momentum with a negative growth of 2.4 percent in 3 months and negative 0.2 percent in 12 months. Clearly the global steel market is slowing. In April, on a rolling 12 months basis, global growth was positive 0.6 percent, May was positive 0.3 percent and June was negative 0.2 percent. The CIS, North America and Asia have negative momentum through June, Europe and South America have positive momentum. Comparing the three months through June in 2014 and 2015, the only region to have positive growth was the European Union. The only nation in the top 10 to have positive growth was India with 0.6 percent. In the June data China was down by 1.1 percent in three months through June year over year, North America was down by 6.7 percent in total with the US down by 9.1 percent, Canada up by 2.7 percent and Mexico down 2.3 percent. The European Union was up by 1.0 percent and other Europe was unchanged with Turkey down by 1.6 percent. The effect of the war in Ukraine is clear in the contraction of that country’s steel production.
Figure 2 shows the 3MMA of the monthly year over year growth of global steel production which was negative in March for the first time since September 2009. April, May and June were down by 2.0 percent, 2.0 percent and 1.8 percent respectively year over year.
We are again publishing the latest World Steel Association Short Range Outlook forecast for apparent steel consumption in 2015 and 2016 and will leave it in these reports until the next revision is released. The forecast for 2015 continues to looks optimistic and that is increasingly the case (Table 2). Note this forecast is steel consumption, not crude steel production which is the main thrust of what you are reading now.
WSA is forecasting a 0.5 percent growth in demand this year followed by 1.4 percent in 2016. Based on this analysis by the WSA, NAFTA has by far the largest deterioration in demand between 2014 and 2015, changing from + 11.3 last year to – 0.9 percent this year. We read the global trends as worse that the WSA forecast suggests and the NAFTA trend as better. The recent decline in the price of oil, of iron ore and of the Baltic Index suggests that the global economy is weakening. Certainly there is a supply side to all three of those measures but it seems that demand is also down and suggests a further slowdown in global steel production in 2015.
Peter WrightRead more from Peter Wright
Latest in Steel Products Prices North America
HRC vs. CRC price spread jumps in second week of new year
The spread between cold-rolled coil (CRC) and hot-rolled coil (HRC) prices jumped during the week of Jan. 8 as cold rolled tags continued to rise while hot rolled tags held steady.
Cliffs increases sheet prices again, seeks $1,150/ton HRC
Cleveland-Cliffs is now targeting base prices of $1,150 per ton for hot-rolled coil (HRC), according to a press release on Wednesday morning, Jan. 3.
Cliffs moves sheet prices higher, seeks $1,100/ton HRC
Cleveland-Cliffs is now targeting base prices of $1,100 per ton ($55 per cwt) for hot-rolled coil (HRC).
SMU price ranges: Sheet surge continues on limited spot availability
Sheet prices shot higher again this week on the heels of another round of mill price increases as well as on reports of production and supply chain issues at certain domestic producers.
Galvanized Sheet’s Premium Over Hot Rolled Hovering Around $200/Ton
The spread between hot-rolled coil (HRC) and galvanized sheet base prices has been hovering near $200 per net ton since late July, according to SMU’s latest analysis.