Steel Products Prices North America
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/27bff6e1e871d21e5ba661adcc788238.jpg)
Should U.S. Penalize Countries with High Rate of Exports?
Written by John Packard
July 23, 2017
Last week, Steel Market Update (SMU) completed our mid-July flat rolled market trends analysis. We invited 650 steel executives to participate. Of those responding, 48 percent were service centers, 41 percent were manufacturing companies, and 8 percent were trading companies, with steel mills and toll processors accounting for 4 percent each.
One of the questions asked was, “Do you think the U.S. government should penalize countries that have a high rate of exports to the U.S. in the name of national security?”
About 30 percent of the respondents said yes, while the majority, 70 percent, replied no.
What Our Respondents Had to Say
Our respondents had plenty to say, and below is a sampling of the more than 25 comments we received on this one question:
“We all need to learn how to compete. Most mills are making far too much money with the duties that are currently in place, so they don’t need more help. Section 232 should be used for what it is intended for and not this.” Manufacturing company
“I disagree with the word penalize. I think every administration should have the goal to balance trade by eliminating currency manipulation. Then industries can stand on their own two feet.” Service center
“I think we should always put the national security of this country first. I am all for “Made in the USA.” But we have to be competitive on a global market. The steel mills need to help us be competitive instead of pricing us out of the market because they don’t know how to make money any other way except through price increases. In our company, we have to figure out how to save money through process and product value analysis and to do more with less. The mills have a privileged mentality. They are being dumped on, so the government should help them. Well guess what, every other industry is being dumped on, as well, but we are on our own.” Manufacturing company
“No, but it seems to be the only tool we have, or at least the only expedient thing that can be done. It would be much better to focus on the major offenders (China). The issue is finding a way to focus on China and close the loopholes that allow China to play global ‘Wack a Mole.’” Manufacturing company
“I have a tough time understanding how some steel studs and duct work in a strip mall in Phoenix is a national security risk. I see a national security risk with Saudi Arabia and North Korea, but not with CR or GI coils.” Trading company
“One of the greatest things about being American is living in the USA with our standard of life, which includes American purchasing power (i.e. free trade gives us plenty of opportunity to acquire low cost / plentiful goods). If the unemployment rate was soaring, I could understand stepping in, but it’s at a historically low level. If all of the mills were losing money or even most of the mills were losing money, I could understand stepping in, but several of the mills, especially the minimills, have shown they are not only strong enough to survive, but at these price levels record huge profits (i.e. Nucor Q1 best since 2008???).” Manufacturing company
“Trump is a fool. Steel imports have nothing to do with national defense. He just wants to help out steel mills while ignoring all the manufacturing below them that really matters.” Trading company
“Penalizing countries simply because they have high rates of steel exports to the U.S. is an interesting but irrelevant reason. Are those exports being dumped here, are they being subsidized, are the products in short supply, do the U.S. mills not want to make them and in turn priced themselves out? Have the U.S. mills allowed the import spread to widen beyond all reason? All those would be good questions to explore, but penalizing on the sole basis of the rate of exports to the U.S. is simply an irrational measurement.” Manufacturing company
“Not in the name of national security. I think that is a load of bunk. Certainly, we need imports, but we need to protect our markets at the same time.” Service center
“I do not believe there is a true “national security threat.” The only threat is to the bottom line of our steel mills and to our economy in general.” HVAC Wholesaler
“Only if there is a huge price gap! Domestic mills can only take care of 70 percent of demand in many products, so imports are needed in several categories to fill the holes.” Service center
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/john-packard.png)
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Products Prices North America
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/07/CRU-Logo-2023-07-21-at-4.35.41-PM.png)
CRU: Longs pricing trends diverge in North, South America
Most longs prices in the US were unchanged this month, except for rebar, which declined by $1.50/cwt ($30/short ton) m/m. While end-use demand is stable, inventories are well-stocked, keeping purchases limited. Domestic availability is sufficient to meet current demand, hindering the appetite for imported material. Meanwhile, prices for scrap remained under pressure in June, with […]
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/Nucor.png)
Nucor cuts plate prices by $125/ton, cites ongoing competition
Nucor Corp. announced that its plate mill group would cut prices for as-rolled, discrete, and normalized plate with the opening of its August order book.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/Nucor.png)
Nucor cuts HR price for fourth straight week
Nucor lowered its consumer spot price (CSP) for hot-rolled (HR) coil by another $10 per short ton (st) for the first week of July. The steelmaker said in a letter to customers on Monday that its CSP base price for the week will be $670/st for all of its sheet mills with the exception of California Steel Industries (CSI).
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/Cliffs_logo2.2.png)
Cliffs sets $720/ton HR price with opening of August books
Cleveland-Cliffs on Tuesday announced its monthly hot-rolled (HR) coil price of $720 per short ton (st) with the official opening of its August order book. The rate is down from last month’s price of $800/st.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/07/CRU-Logo-2023-07-21-at-4.35.41-PM.png)
CRU: Demand weakness continues to weigh on global sheet markets
Demand has remained persistently weak across the globe for sheet steel, weighing on prices. US HR coil prices fell the furthest this week as high-volume, low-priced deals were transacted as mills looked to fill order books and competed with one another amid relative demand weakness. Meanwhile, European prices were also down due to low demand […]