Trade Cases

Senate Members Fear NAFTA Withdrawal
Written by Sandy Williams
December 8, 2017
Withdrawal from NAFTA is looking more likely, said Democratic and Republican senators who met separately with President Trump and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer last week.
Six Republicans who attended a meeting at the White House on Tuesday said it is likely the president will trigger the withdrawal process after the sixth round of talks in January and try to use the six-month termination period as leverage to negotiate a new deal.
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) told Inside U.S. Trade that lawmakers expressed strong opinions at the meeting and voiced their opposition to a withdrawal.
Agriculture was at the forefront of concerns by Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA). “We’re still in discussions, so I just keep emphasizing to the president the importance of trade as it applies to agriculture,” said Ernst.” I am pleased the president was willing to sit down and visit with us, but we remain committed to strong agricultural trade.”
Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee had their turn on Wednesday, meeting with Lighthizer at the request of Ron Wyden (D-OR). The meeting was described as “contentious” by a Democratic aide.
Lighthizer gave no reassurance to Senate members that the U.S. would continue the NAFTA agreement, reported Inside U.S. Trade, who talked with members following the meeting.
“He said it’s not his decision,’” said Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD). “He says ‘I can only tell you what I can do. And I will certainly do everything I can do to work with you on all decisions that are made, but I work for the president.’”
“He gave us no comfort level at all,” Cardin added.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) said Lighthizer “basically acknowledged agriculture is in big trouble.” The “do no harm” approach touted by the administration will be impossible if the U.S. withdraws from NAFTA, she said.
“Agriculture is going to get hurt terribly. It’s the foundation of my state’s economy,” said McCaskill. “I think [Lighthizer] understands it, but I think they’re willing to [withdraw]. I hope the people in rural Missouri figure it out that this administration’s trade policy potentially could gut them.”
The Democratic aide told Inside U.S. Trade that senators expressed concern regarding the proposed sunset clause and changes to the dispute mechanism.
Lighthizer expressed frustration that Mexico and Canada have not capitulated to U.S. demands. The senators were frustrated, said the aide, that the USTR didn’t seem to have a strategy to deal with the stalled talks and were concerned about “how China might benefit from a NAFTA collapse.”
Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) told Inside U.S. Trade that Lighthizer also blamed Democrats for delaying confirmation of trade nominees.
“I didn’t think it was productive to get into a back-and-forth with him about that,” said Casey.

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

CSPA, USW say Canadian government’s steel action ‘falls short’
CSPA, USW disappointed in Canadian government's actions on steel.

Canada, mirroring the US, plans to take harder line on imported steel and aluminum
The actions, which includes tariffs, are necessary to protect the Canadian market from global overcapacity. They are also needed because other countries have redirected material to Canada as a result of higher US tariffs, Carney said.

Industry cautiously optimistic despite lack of steel specifics in US-UK trade deal
Details of a new tariff-rate quota on US imports of British steel are lacking in the new US-UK trade deal.

Mexico shuts down steel importer amid trade talks
The Mexican government shut down two plants and warehouses operated by US-based LAU Industries.

US and Canada talk trade, market contemplates fate of S232 steel protections
Trade talks are progressing between the US and the market is contemplating the future of Section 232 tariffs.