• Skip to main content

    Market Data

    February 2, 2018

    Could Section 232 Cause a Steel Shortage?

    Written by Tim Triplett

    Inaction by the Trump administration leaves the market to wonder if the Section 232 investigation will lead to new tariffs or quotas this year on steel imports. Steel buyers contacted by Steel Market Update are concerned that additional restrictions on foreign imports may create a shortage and make steel prices even more volatile. Following are some of their more insightful comments:

    • “If U.S. GDP is rolling at 3 percent plus this year and imports are further limited, yes, we will see shortages. I would expect we’d need at least 30 million tons of imports to balance demand domestically in 2018.”
    • “We are approaching a very critical period for steel. The combination of constricted supply and strong demand may lead to allocation of some degree.”
    • “It’s possible we could reach a point where HR could become very tight/short, if a large portion of pipe/tube imports are prevented from coming here. One would assume that BOF restarts at USS and AK would occur, if the import restrictions on pipe/tube are slated to be in place for a multi-year duration. This would be required for the mills to invest to restart the furnaces. It would also require HR import price spreads to remain unattractive, as has been the case for a while.”
    • “I am very concerned about possible shortages. Domestic mills are not ramping up production to keep up with demand, and they are putting contract buyers on allocation. They were very vocal that they could meet U.S. manufacturers’ steel needs when pushing for Section 232. Well, they currently are not doing that. The mill capacity utilization rate is still dropping while demand is increasing. That’s not a good recipe for U.S. manufacturers. It’s time to put up or shut up, as far as I am concerned. The mills have record profits, but bottom line they are not doing what they stated they would do. They need to produce more steel quickly.”
    • “It [shortage] would depend on the severity of the action the president takes. For our material needs, things would need to go pretty dark in the U.S. for this to affect us much. I’m still hoping the worst of this blows over by the end of the year and we can get back to a new normal. Then again, Trump’s infrastructure plan is going to cost the taxpayers a whole lot more than anticipated if he locks out imports.”
    • “Yes, I’m concerned about shortages, and if we have unplanned outages it will really mess up the market. I think we got lucky the AK outage wasn’t more severe.”
    • “Obviously, if they limit imports, there will be a shortage. The U.S. cannot supply all our demand. Those who have not been a buyer of domestic steel will be out in the cold for a while and will have to make some tough decisions on how to keep their factories running. Steel prices are already volatile. I think an announcement on 232 will stabilize pricing somewhat…unless the government has something else up their sleeves to keep the industry in turmoil.”
    • “Shortages and pricing are yet to be determined. Several factors need to happen to influence both. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Fair and reciprocal trade was the loud and clear message coming out of Davos. America First, not America Alone, is also something that needs to be considered on all levels. Will this apply to steel? We’ll see.” 
    • “In theory, I’m not concerned about shortages. I think price stability at or around today’s levels should be the goal. Couple that with efficient and sustained domestic utilization at 80-plus percent and I believe the industry will begin to recover toward long-term prosperity. The elephant in the room is the importing of finished goods that compete directly with the domestic customers that we all serve. If a determination is made respective to 232 against base metal and it does not include finished parts, our customers will certainly suffer.”
    • “I don’t think there will be a shortage of steel. I just think the president’s actions will allow mills to push prices higher to make big profits to the detriment of steel-consuming manufacturers who will be rendered further uncompetitive with overseas producers of steel-containing components.”
    • “Yes, I am concerned about shortages. That’s why I think Trump will temper his reaction.”

    Tim Triplett

    Read more from Tim Triplett

    Latest in Market Data

    Drilling activity ticks up in the US, eases in Canada

    The latest tally of active drilling rigs moved marginally higher in the US, up for the first time in five weeks. Activity eased in Canada this week, according to oil and gas rig count data published by Baker Hughes. The US rig count increased to 604 rigs this week, setting an 18-month high watermark. Compared with this time last year, 56 more rigs are in operation today. Canada’s count declined by three to 223 rigs this week, easing for the first time in three weeks. Activity is up from the same week of 2025, with 32 more rigs operating today.

    SMU scrap market survey results now available

    SMU’s November ferrous scrap market survey results are now available on our website to all premium members. After logging in at steelmarketupdate.com, visit the Pricing and Analysis tab and look under the “survey results” section for Ferrous Scrap Survey results. Past scrap survey results are also available under that selection. If you need help accessing the survey results or if your company would like to have your voice heard in our future surveys, contact smu@crugroup.com.

    Market chatter: Supply, not price, dominates steel buyers’ concerns

    On Monday and Tuesday of this week, SMU polled steel buyers on an array of topics, ranging from market prices, demand, and inventories to tariffs, imports, and evolving market events. We are sharing a selection of the comments we received below, in each buyer’s own words. Before diving in, we reviewed all the responses collected and compiled these key takeaways: Respondents overwhelmingly anticipate further increases. Buyers cite limited supply, mill delays, low inventories, and steady-to-strong demand. Most say demand is generally stable to improving, with some purchasing driven by fears of higher prices or unavailable material rather than stronger underlying consumption. Most respondents report faster inventory turnover, while shortages are constraining sales and, in some cases, prompting customer allocations. Buyers increasingly see imports as a way to secure scarce material, though domestic-origin requirements, delivery timing, and pricing risks remain obstacles.

    ISM: Manufacturing sector expanded in October

    US manufacturing activity expanded for the 10th consecutive month in October, according to supply executives in the Institute for Supply Management's latest report. The October ISM Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index registered 55.5%, up one percentage point from the prior month. An index reading above 50% indicates the manufacturing economy is growing, while a reading below that indicates contraction. ISM noted that the overall economy continued to expand in October for the 24th consecutive month, emphasizing that a PMI reading above 47.5% over a period of time generally indicates that the overall economy is growing.

    US steel output reaches 18-year high as South leads gains: AISI

    Domestic raw steel production surged last week, reaching its highest output in almost two decades, according to the latest American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) figures. While the seesaw pattern continued for US production this past week, production swelled to its highest reading since Aug. 23, 2008, driven by a massive swing in the South. The increase reversed the recent downward trend, with a sharp rebound in the South accounting for nearly all the weekly gain. Production has fluctuated considerably over the past two months, reaching both an 18-year high and its lowest level since January.