SMU Data and Models

New SMU Report Identifies CR Sheet Imports by Product Detail
Written by Tim Triplett
June 12, 2018
Premium subscribers to Steel Market Update receive reports on imports broken down into district of entry and source nation. This new report from SMU takes the analysis to the product detail level. Our rationale is that the more information steel buyers have about product coming into their region, the better job they can do of negotiating with suppliers.
Using U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) data, SMU has taken the import tonnage of cold rolled sheet and broken it down into coil and leveled, then breaks it out into four thickness ranges and identifies how much is full hard, annealed and high strength. Finally, this analysis is taken to the district-of-entry level. This report does not include strip. Total year-to-date sheet and strip imports through April were 554,763 and 15,576 metric tons, respectively.
Table 1 (click to enlarge) is a monthly summary and year-to-date 2018 showing each of these conditions.
Figure 1 breaks the year-to-date cold rolled sheet tonnage down into the four gauge ranges that are identified in the HTS codes.
Figure 2 does the same thing for condition. It identifies the volume of full hard, annealed, high strength and high strength annealed.
Table 2 is a small part of a sheet that shows detail for every region in the U.S. and is available in the premium section of our website. It shows the product detail of cold rolled sheet imports by district of entry. For example, the largest tonnage item entering Boston in the first four months of 2018 was 1-3 mm thick, annealed. How much of the same product came into Houston for the year? The answer is 18,589 tons, which was the highest volume item into that district.
Note: This data was accessed through the USITC database. All steel traded globally is classified by the Harmonized Tariff System (HTS). The HTS code has 10 digits. The first six are globally universal. The last four are used at the discretion of the nations involved in a particular transaction and are the basis of this report. The way the U.S. uses the last four digits to define products may be different from other nations’ product classification.

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in SMU Data and Models

SMU’s June at a glance
A look at SMU data for the month of June.

SMU Survey: Buyers’ Sentiment rebounds from multi-year low
Both of SMU’s Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices edged higher this week. Current Sentiment rebounded from a near five-year low, while Future Sentiment rose to a two-month high

SMU flat-rolled market survey results now available
SMU’s latest steel buyers market survey results are now available on our website to all premium members.

SMU Survey: Sheet lead times pull back after early-June blip, plate holds
Following the uptick seen two weeks ago, lead times eased this week for all four sheet products tracked by SMU, while plate lead times held steady, according to this week’s market survey.

SMU Survey: Pricing power abruptly shifts to steel buyers
The majority of steel buyers responding to our latest market survey say domestic mills are more willing to talk price on sheet and plate products than they were earlier this month. Sheet negotiation rates rebounded across the board compared to early June, while our plate negotiation rate hit a full 100%.