Trade Cases
Democrats Challenge Lighthizer on Bilateral Negotiations
Written by Sandy Williams
September 11, 2018
The Trump administration’s negotiating objectives for NAFTA were challenged by Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee this week. A Sept. 10 letter to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer questioned whether the bilateral deal with Mexico was “in the spirit of the Trade Promotion Authority.”
The members said they were surprised by the formal notification to Congress of a trade deal with Mexico given that previously published objectives for NAFTA were specific to a trilateral deal.
“While we appreciate that it takes time to iron out the final details and text, we believe that it is not in the spirit of TPA to send Congress an official notification letter until all three parties have formally agreed to move forward together with an updated trilateral agreement,” said the seven Democrats in their letter to Lighthizer.
The group questioned how an informed report can be submitted to Congress by the Advisory Committee if it is unknown whether Canada will be part of the agreement. The Advisory Committee, comprised of 28 advisory committees representing public and private investments, must submit a report within 30 days of the Aug. 31 notification from USTR. The group requested clarification on whether the current plan is to submit a report on the U.S./Mexico deal and revise it if Canada joins, and, if so, will it allow time for the Advisory Committee to meet the 30-day deadline.
In addition, the full text of the agreement must be made public 60 days before signature. It is unclear whether it will be a U.S./Mexico trade agreement or one that includes Canada with any relative side letters.
“Trump is relying on bluster and bullying in a desperate attempt to get Congress to swallow his half-baked deal,” said Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-OR) in a statement last week. “You can’t fix NAFTA without fixing issues with Canada: from dairy and wine to red tape on small shipments and new digital commitments, to eliminating NAFTA’s unconstitutional review of our trade remedy laws that has benefited Canada, and more. Cutting Canada out is surrendering on these issues.”
Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland is expected to take part in discussions in Washington today before leaving for a Liberty party retreat.
Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has stressed that a NAFTA deal must include a system for trade remedy dispute settlement, as well as cultural exemptions.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.
Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.