Steel Products
Leibowitz on Trade: Steel on the Docket
Written by Tim Triplett
October 18, 2018
Lewis Leibowitz, trade attorney and contributor to Steel Market Update, offers the following commentary on the latest developments in Washington:
Three items of interest for today, which will be expanded upon as events warrant:
- WTO Disputes on Section 232 Tariffs—At least two WTO members (the EU and Norway) requested formation of a dispute settlement panel over the steel and aluminum Section 232 tariffs. About a dozen countries opened dispute settlement proceedings against the United States earlier this year with requests for consultations. Norway and the EU reported today that the consultations did not lead to an “amicable settlement” of the dispute, and therefore they are initiating a request for the formation of a dispute settlement panel. These requests will be taken up at the next meeting of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). The U.S. can block these requests once, but next month they can no longer be blocked. Expect a panel decision, assuming no settlement is reached, in about a year.
- Court Decision—U.S. Steel sued the Commerce Department over the antidumping order on Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, an order going back to 2014. The duty deposit rates for two “mandatory” respondents, Jindal SAW and GVN, were recalculated by Commerce as a result of litigation filed by USS and others. Jindal’s rate went up and GVN’s rate went down below 2 percent. Because 2 percent is the “de minimis” level, GVN’s rate was no longer used to calculate the rate for all other exporters and producers, who were not investigated. However, Commerce did not change the “all others” rate. USS insisted that they should. The Court of International Trade agreed, and ordered Commerce to recalculate the rate, which went up to 11.24 percent from 5.79 percent. All importers of OCTG from India will now have to post a cash deposit nearly double the rate they thought was established. The lesson is that non-investigated companies can have their positions changed without their knowledge or involvement. Keep your powder dry and your lawyer on speed dial.
- Oral Argument—The oral argument in the AIIS suit challenging the constitutionality of the Section 232 steel tariffs has been set for Dec. 19. A decision in the case will probably follow in the first few months of 2019. Stay tuned.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Steel Products
CRU: US stainless prices to rise on expanded S232 tariffs
Stainless prices in the US market will rise, following price increases by major US producers. Our base case scenario incorporates higher US prices in the near term, despite the initial negative reaction by the market. US stainless prices will go up in 2025 H2 and will stay elevated in 2026 as tariffs on stainless […]
Galvanized steel demand unsteady amid lingering buyer fatigue: HARDI
Uneven demand for galvanized steel in June reflects a market that remains mired in uncertainty, according to industry sources.
OCTG industry salutes Customs for catching trade crooks
The US OCTG Manufacturers Association is commending US Customs for intercepting another Thai company's attempt to illegally transship Chinese oil pipe to the US.
Whirlpool says tariffs will bolster business
“Economically, the business case for products made in the us has become a lot more attractive," the CEO told Fox Business.
Worthington Enterprises buys Elgen Manufacturing
Worthington Enterprises acquires HVAC products maker Elgen Manufacturing.