Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: Status Report on Section 301
Written by Tim Triplett
December 9, 2018
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
In the week following the G20 summit meeting in Buenos Aires, there is more uncertainty than ever about the U.S.-China negotiations over tariffs.
Early in the week, President Trump moved the deadline for agreement between the U.S. and China closer. Instead of 90 days from Jan. 1 (March 31), the president announced that the deadline was 90 days from Dec. 2, or March 1, 2019. U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer yesterday stated his view that this was a “hard” deadline—no extensions of the negotiations, at least as far as he was concerned. Markets continue to be roiled over the news of a possible escalation of U.S.-China trade tensions.
As the tariffs continue, there were a few reports on the product exclusion process for the “Section 301” tariffs, which apply only to goods originating in China (that is not quite accurate, but close enough for present discussions). I took the opportunity to examine the latest USTR score sheet on tariff exclusions under Section 301. These are NOT to be confused with the steel and aluminum tariffs:
Tariff Group 1—These tariffs (25 percent on $34 billion of 2017) went into effect on July 6, 2018. Exclusion requests were due to be filed by Oct. 9.
The latest numbers from USTR on the status of exclusion requests:
- Total number of requests filed: 10,767
- Requests denied as of Dec. 7: 1,487
- Requests subject to public comment: 73
- Requests under substantive review: 8,572
- Requests referred to Customs and Border Protection for administrative feasibility: 635
- Requests approved: 0
Tariff Group 2—These tariffs (25 percent on $16 billion of 2017 trade value) went into effect on Aug. 23, 2018. Exclusion requests are due to be filed by Dec. 18. The latest numbers:
- Total number of requests filed as of Dec. 7: 908
- Requests denied as of Dec. 7: 0
- Requests still subject to public comment: 224
- Requests under substantive review: 684
- Requests referred to Customs and Border Protection for administrative feasibility: 0
- Requests approved: 0
To summarize—exclusion requests approved: 0; exclusion requests denied: 1,487.
Steel Product Exclusions—The data regarding steel product exclusions are difficult to summarize. Exclusions are being approved and denied. The precise criteria for approval are not being publicly revealed by the Bureau of Industry and Security at the Commerce Department. There have been reports that some approvals have come over the objections of domestic producers, but this has not been verified as far as I can tell. I continue to seek confirmation. Many requests are still pending that received no objections.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.
SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.
CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America
Price on trade: A lot happened last week – and it wasn’t all about tariffs
Should foreign investment be allowed to reshape the American steel Industry? Not to be lost in the recent on-again-off-again tariff frenzy, Nippon Steel’s proposed takeover of U.S. Steel has also found itself in President Trump’s crosshairs when it comes to trade and industrial policy. Nippon Steel initially announced its nearly $15-billion bid for U.S. Steel […]