Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: New China Tariffs Pushed Out to June 1
Written by Lewis Leibowitz
May 16, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
Several notices have been published in the last few days, signaling the new reality of the contentious trade negotiations between the U.S. and China.
- USTR issued a notice, which has not yet been seen in the Federal Register, setting a schedule for public comments and a hearing on covering new products. The list (which I’m referring to as “List Four”) covers virtually all tariff numbers that are not on Lists One, Two or Three. It covers about $300 billion in import value (2017 numbers), adding to the values of List One ($34 billion), List Two ($16 billion) and List Three ($200 billion). Total import value: $550 billion, or just about everything imported from China. Requests to appear at the hearing are due by June 10, and comments by June 17. The hearing date is also June 17.
- USTR issued another notice, published Tuesday, modifying the effective date of the new 25 percent tariffs on List Three. As I reported a few days ago, the effective date for the new tariff rate was May 10 (last Friday). But only goods that were exported from China on or after May 10 were subject to the 25 percent rate. Customs published a fairly confusing notice saying that, until further guidance was received, the 25 percent rate would be applicable. Now, USTR has modified the process—the new effective date for the 25 percent tariff is June 1. I have not had a chance to talk with anyone about the reasons for the change, but I can guess. It is very hard to determine with certainty the date of export of a product. The bill of lading will say when the product was put on board ship, but there are no documents that will definitively state when the ship actually left the country of export. Bottom line: The 25 percent tariffs are effective on June 1, not May 10.
- USTR issued a new round of product exclusions under the China Tariffs. These exclusions are from List One. This is the fourth exclusion list from the List One tariffs. Earlier lists were published on Dec. 28, 2018; March 25, 2019; and April 18, 2019. Unlike product exclusions from steel and aluminum tariffs, and Section 201 tariffs on solar panels, cells and washing machines, the Section 301 product exclusions apply to all imports of the products described. In other words, companies needn’t have actually submitted exclusion requests to benefit. The exclusions are retroactive to July 6, the effective date for the List One tariffs. If you have questions, please let me know.
- China has not been idle, either. China’s Ministry of Finance announced a retaliation list on imports to China from the United States. News articles are starting to appear—China is trying to grab the attention of major interest groups. Among them is the energy industry, which is now facing, as of June 1, 25 percent tariffs on exports of liquified natural gas to China. LNG has turned into a major export for the United States, thanks to “fracking” technology, which has unlocked tremendous reserves of oil and gas.
As I said Sunday, this trade war looks like a long game.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Lewis Leibowitz
Read more from Lewis LeibowitzLatest in Trade Cases
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.
Commerce launches investigation into imports of coated flat-rolled steel
On Thursday, the Department of Commerce announced it would initiate investigations into coated steel imports from ten countries.
Op-Ed: Despite misclassification games, import data supports surge of Mexican conduit
Barry Zekelman, chairman and CEO of Zekelman Industries, says the import data unquestionably supports the fact that imports of Mexican conduit have been surging into the US market.
Leibowitz: The Mexican steel import “surge”—and what to do about it
US presidential campaigns frequently sport an “air of unreality.” No more so than the 2024 campaign, where superlatives fly around like mosquitos. Steel trade has been a feature of political discourse for at least half a century now. Just last week, it proceeded to a new level of “unreality.” Four senators - Bob Casey (D-Pa.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.) - wrote a “bipartisan” letter attacking Mexican exports of steel to the United States. They framed it as a “surge” in US steel imports from Mexico. To address this “surge,” the Senators urge the imposition of 25% tariffs on all steel imports from Mexico.