Trade Cases

Trump's Tariffs on China Face Pushback
Written by Tim Triplett
August 13, 2019
Tariffs on some of the $300 billion in Chinese goods due to take effect on Sept. 1 have been pushed back until Dec. 15, and some items are likely to be removed from the tariff list entirely, as the Trump administration faces opposition from U.S. companies that claim the duties are hurting their businesses, The Wall Street Journal reported today.
Tariffs Hurt the Heartland – a national campaign opposed to the tariffs – is supported by many such companies in retail, tech, manufacturing and agriculture. American businesses and consumers paid $6 billion in tariffs in June 2019, one of the highest tariffed months in U.S. history, the group reported Aug. 7, citing Census Bureau data. The administration raised tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods from 10 to 25 percent in May.
It’s not the Chinese, but rather American businesses and consumers, that ultimately must pay the tariffs, the trade group argues. In total, American taxpayers have paid over $27 billion in extra import tariffs from the beginning of the trade war in 2018 through June of this year. Nearly 75 percent of those tariffs are due to the China 301 tariff actions. In fact, June saw a marked increase in tariff totals despite the fact that steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico were removed.
“Americans are already paying record-high tariffs, and the biggest hit to consumers is still to come on Sept. 1,” said Tariffs Hurt the Heartland spokesman Jonathan Gold in a statement Aug. 7. “Taxing hardworking Americans isn’t doing a thing to address China’s trade abuses. Instead, these tariffs are costing American jobs, raising prices, hurting farmers and derailing U.S. economic growth. We continue to urge the administration to change course, and we call on Congress to get off the sidelines and take back its legislative authority on trade.”
For more information and to view the group’s “Tariff Tracker,” visit tariffshurt.com.

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.