Trade Cases

Leibowitz on Trade: Signs of Progress in U.S.-China Trade Negotiations?
Written by Tim Triplett
September 22, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
On Friday, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative published three notices in the Federal Register announcing new exclusions from the China-related tariffs imposed beginning in July 2018. As you will recall, there are four published lists of goods from China that are being hit with tariffs of 25 or 30 percent at present:
List One ($34 billion of trade) became effective July 6, 2018.
List Two ($16 billion) became effective Aug. 23, 2018.
List Three ($200 billion) became effective Sept. 24, 2018. Those tariffs started at 10 percent, but were increased to 25 percent in May 2019. The rates are scheduled to increase to 30 percent on Oct. 1, 2019.
List Four ($300 billion) became effective on Sept. 1, 2019, for about half of the products and Dec. 15, 2019, for the other half. Before Sept. 1, USTR increased the tariffs from 10 percent to 15 percent.
On Sept. 20, USTR announced exclusions on more than 400 separate products on Lists One (310 items), Two (89 items) and Three (38 items). The 437 exclusions are by far the highest number of exclusions listed by USTR on any single day.
Only a few exclusions involved metal products, including narrowly described girders, pipes and supports. The exclusions must meet several very specific requirements.
These exclusions benefit U.S. companies that purchase and use the imported items in manufacturing, distribution and retailing. All were granted based on exclusion requests filed by these companies. Unlike the steel and aluminum exclusions, however, these China trade exclusions may be utilized by any company that imports the products described.
Clearly, the exclusions send a signal to U.S. companies that the tariff war may be closer to resolution.
In addition to the large number of exclusions granted on Friday, China has granted some modest exclusions of its own from retaliatory tariffs. In addition, a significant purchase of soybeans was announced last week by China, a rare bit of good news for American agriculture in the midst of the trade war.
A second-tier trade delegation from China was in Washington for talks last week. No details were reported, but both sides assessed the talks as constructive. A principals group (including USTR Robert Lighthizer and China Vice-Premier Liu He) will meet in Washington during the week of Oct. 7, based on current plans. A Chinese delegation was scheduled to visit farms in Montana and Nebraska as part of last week’s negotiations, but the farm visits were cancelled due to optics, based on what I have been told. China does not want to be seen to interfere in U.S. internal affairs, and insists that the U.S. also refrain from activities that could be construed as interference in domestic matters.
The exclusions may mollify some in the U.S. who complain that the trade war is hurting them by disrupting their supply chains without showing the prospect of meaningful changes in China’s actions. Progress is certainly slow.
President Trump said over the weekend that he does not want an “interim” deal, presumably to keep pressure on China to make major changes in their policies and practices involving intellectual property protection, technology transfer and restrictions on foreign investment. Things could well take a negative turn before there are concrete results on those difficult issues.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.