Trade Cases

Commerce Proposes Changes to AD/CVD Rules
Written by Sandy Williams
August 13, 2020
The Department of Commerce is proposing modifications to antidumping and countervailing duty regulations to make them more efficient and to create new enforcement tools to address circumvention and evasion.
In a detailed rule published in the Federal Register, Commerce proposes:
- The creation of standalone rules governing Commerce’s conduct of circumvention inquiries. The new rules set out specific timelines, procedures for imposing duties when circumvention is found, and explicit authorization for Commerce to self-initiate.
- The creation of rules for Commerce to assist U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in combating duty evasion. The new rules establish a procedure for Commerce to address CBP’s questions about potential evasion, implementing legislation signed into law in 2016.
- Rules that prevent foreign companies from abusing new shipper reviews. The rules provide that if the foreign company requesting a review fails to provide evidence of bona fide sales, then Commerce can decline to initiate the review – instead of waiting until the review is already underway to obtain such evidence, as is done under Commerce’s current regulations.
- Updated rules on scope inquiries that streamline existing procedures and expedite deadlines. These revisions also deter abuse of scope procedures by ensuring that AD/CVD duties apply to products determined to be subject to AD/CVD orders, regardless of when a scope ruling was requested.
Commerce has initiated 281 new antidumping and countervailing duty investigations under the Trump administration—a 260 percent increase from the previous administration. Currently, 431 AD/CVD orders are maintained on unfairly traded imports.
The specifics of each proposed change can be viewed in the Federal Register. Commerce invites the public to submit comments by Sept. 14 that will be taken into consideration when issuing a final rule.

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.