• Skip to main content

    Government/Policy

    Leibowitz on Trade: A Tariff Reprieve for Solar Panels and Cells

    Written by Lewis Leibowitz


    Antidumping and countervailing duty (“trade remedy”) cases provide a rare glimpse into tariffs on imported goods that entered the US before they were subject to these burdensome duties. In the opinion of some, retroactively applied tariffs are always unfair to importers and their downstream US customers.

    Others disagree, believing that they deter imports competing with domestic production. “Circumvention” proceedings are one of several examples in trade remedy cases in which retroactive tariffs are possible.

    Lewis Leibowitz, SMU Contributor

    Lewis Leibowitz

    Read more from Lewis Leibowitz

    Latest in Government/Policy

    Join SMU on Tuesday for a Community Chat with SMA President Philip K. Bell

    Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), will join SMU for a Community Chat on Tuesday, Nov. 17. The live webinar is free for anyone to attend. The recording and slide decks will be available only to SMU subscribers. Bell is plugged into steel and plugged into DC politics, which makes this chat a must-see, especially as we prepare for a new, Democratic-controlled Congress to convene in January.

    Price: Blue wave may rock tariff boat, but some ships like Section 232 aren’t sinking

    The midterms are over, and Democrats will control both chambers of Congress in January. In this space last week, Lewis Leibowitz predicted that President Trump's tariffs, including Section 232, may not last much longer. We disagree. To be sure, the new Congress will change trade policy. It will hold hearings, write bills, and almost certainly revisit the trade dispute with Canada. But the foundation of US trade policy is unlikely to be disturbed. Section 232 and Section 301 are established, court-tested authorities that both parties have used. They are also working.