Final Thoughts

US Govt, Domestic Steel Boo WTO Section 232 Decision
December 9, 2022
The federal government and the domestic steel industry lashed out against a World Trade Organization (WTO) decision ruling that the US violated international trade rules with Section 232 national security tariffs on steel and aluminum.
The WTO on Friday, Dec. 9, ruled in favor of Norway, which challenged the Section 232 tariffs – 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum. Section 232 was implemented with an executive order from former President Donald Trump in 2018. The tariffs have remained in place under President Joe Biden, although they have been significantly scaled back against US allies such as the European Union, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
The US signaled it would challenge the WTO ruling. The nation “strongly rejects the flawed interpretation and conclusions in the WTO Panel,” Assistant United States Trade Representative Adam Hodge said in a statement on Friday.
“The Biden Administration is committed to preserving US national security by ensuring the long-term viability of our steel and aluminum industries, and we do not intend to remove the Section 232 duties as a result of these disputes,” he added.
“The United States has held the clear and unequivocal position, for over 70 years, that issues of national security cannot be reviewed in WTO dispute settlement, and the WTO has no authority to second guess the ability of a WTO Member to respond to a wide range of threats to its security,” Hodge continued.
USTR Katherine Tai is a member of Biden’s cabinet and a primary advisor and negotiator on trade issues.
The United Steelworkers (USW) union, the Steel Manufacturers Association of America (SMA), American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), and Nucor Corp. also criticized the WTO ruling and lauded the US decision to fight it.
Both the USW and AISI said the WTO had overstepped its mandate.
“The United States was right to ensure that we could meet our national security and critical infrastructure needs in steel and aluminum with domestic production,” USW international president Tom Conway said in a statement. “But instead … the WTO is trying to tell America how we can protect ourselves.”
AISI president and CEO Kevin Dempsey echoed the sentiment.
“Each member of the WTO has the right to determine what action it considers necessary to protect its own national security, and today’s panel ruling disregards this central feature of the WTO system,” he said in a statement.
Going further, he said, “The WTO has no authority to second-guess the U.S. government on matters of our national security.”
Conway thinks the US actions have been effective so far. “Section 232 relief helped to promote production, investment, and job creation, while keeping America safe.” The US must maintain the tariffs and “refuse to bow to the misguided efforts of the WTO lawyers,” he added.
Likewise, the SMA cheered the US for challenging the WTO. “We support the United States government’s refusal to accept the conclusions of today’s World Trade Organization Panel reports involving challenges to the United States’ Section 232 national security measures on steel,” SMA president Philip K. Bell said in a statement. He, too, stressed that the US does not intend to remove the Section 232 duties.
The SMA and AISI both noted that the decision only underscores that change is necessary at the WTO.
“These convoluted reports underscore the need for WTO reform and highlight the ineffectiveness of body in dealing with global excess steel capacity and market distorting behavior,” Bell said.
AISI’s Dempsey said this decision highlights once again “why significant and systemic reform of the WTO dispute settlement system is essential” to ensure all WTO members’ rights are fully protected.
Electric-arc furnace steelmaker Nucor agreed. “The WTO’s recent decision is one more example of overreaching and further undermines the legitimacy of the WTO dispute settlement system,” Nucor president and CEO Leon Topalian said in a statement. “Reform of this broken system is long overdue,” he added.
The unified voice is notable because the USW is the pre-eminent steel union in the US. Nucor, meanwhile, is a non-union EAF steel producer.
The US negotiated tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), or “soft: quotas, to replace Section 232 with the European Union, Japan and the United Kingdom. Other nations, notably Brazil and South Korea, are subject to a “hard” quota rather than a 25% tariff. And many exclusions to the tariffs have also been granted.
But Section 232 remains controversial. China, India, Russia, Switzerland, and Turkey have also challenged the tariffs at the WTO.
By Ethan Bernard, Ethan@steelmarketupdate.com
Latest in Final Thoughts

Final Thoughts
As Wolfe Research’s Timna Tanner put it in her opening talk at Tampa on Monday afternoon, we’re living in a world of “Trumplications” now. That probably means – at least in the short term – higher scrap costs, lower imports from countries hit with or threated tariffs, and higher steel prices. SMU data reflects that. Scrap went up in January. More than 75% of the respondents to our more recent survey expect scrap to go up again February, maybe by a lot. Lead times, meanwhile, have been ticking upward this month. It started with hot-rolled coil and plate earlier this month. Now we’re seeing coated lead times extending too.

Final Thoughts
We joked in our last Final Thoughts that Wiley trade attorney Tim Brightbill – one of the nation’s leading experts on trade law and policy – would probably be revising his presentation on Trump, trade policy, and tariffs for the Tampa Steel Conference. He did. And even after those last-minute revisions, he actually got trumped […]

Final Thoughts
The whole SMU team is packing up our laptops and our SMU polos/cardigans, loading up the PowerPoint slides, and preparing to make the trek down to Florida for the Tampa Steel Conference. There will be plenty to talk about!

Final Thoughts
From one group of folks, I’ve heard that Trump might not wait until Feb. 1 – the date he threatened on to place tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico. They say he could act as soon as Friday. And then there are those who don’t think anything will happen before April 1. That’s the deadline for Commerce, Treasury, and USTR to submit key reports on “America First Trade Policy” to President Trump.

Final Thoughts
Trump made a clarification in a speech on Monday. Previously, he had declared the word “tariff” the most beautiful word in the dictionary. No longer.