After surprising the market watchers of HR futures in the first week of May, the index finally gave back $40 per short ton (ST) in the second week, coming in just shy of $1,130/ST.
Interestingly, the May futures settlement was almost unchanged from April 10 . While the market may be in a hurry for price corrections, the indexes prove they tend to lag.
Reports of scarce physical activity, along with declining lead time deliveries from mills, seem to have increased bearish sentiment. Softness in global steel demand, as well as increasing imports, have only added to concerns that prices could slide further. In spite of the steeply backwardated futures curve, hedging participants are still wary that prices could slide even further, which appears to be muting volumes. In addition, the steep decline in prices between futures months is adding to concerns for service centers of being stuck with expensive contract tons should the velocity of the price decline increase. Lower spot volumes tend to slow the index prices declines.
In the last month, futures volumes have been steady with just under 20,500 lots traded. Open Interest finished April just above 30,200 lots. We have seen a slight erosion in activity as participants remain on the sidelines due to reduced physical activity. Over the last month, settlement prices have eroded somewhat: Q3’23 prices have on average declined by about $55/ST, Q4’23 prices have on average declined by about $45/ST, and 1H’24 quarterly prices have eased roughly $25/ST.
Receding global demand for scrap left export prices considerably lower with 80/20 in the $375/ton range. While the market was anticipating a $25-30 price decline in BUS for May.
The market demand for prime scrap kept BUS above $550/ST for May’23 value, less than a $16/GT decline. Will the scheduled summer model changeovers at the auto manufacturers be enough to offset the increased EAF capacity that is coming on-line? The jury is still out on that. BUS prices have been proving to be very sticky.
Editor’s note: Want to learn more about steel futures? Registration is open for SMU’s Introduction to Steel Hedging: Managing Price Risk Workshop. It will be held on April 26 in Chicago. Learn more and register here.
By Jack Marshall of Crunch Risk LLC
Jack MarshallRead more from Jack Marshall
Latest in Futures
HRC futures: Ferrous futures in consolidation mode
The March scrap trade is set to pick up steam next week.
HRC futures: ‘Normalcy’ not seen on near-term horizon
Over my years of observing the steel market, there's been a recurring belief that current market disruptions in either the physical spot market or steel futures are temporary anomalies, destined to fade, and that normalcy will soon return. However, the events of the first few weeks of 2024 served as a stark reminder that this expectation seldom materializes, and that the US steel market is still the most volatile steel market in the world.
HRC futures: Understanding and addressing HRC basis risk
It’s no secret that HRC futures have been particularly volatile over the past several years. The most recent instance was the outsized break in the March futures contract early this week. For companies procuring raw material in anticipation of higher prices or even to get ahead on future purchase orders from customers, understanding the relative price of that raw material versus the hot-rolled coil futures curve is important.
HRC futures: Momentum picking up on HR spot price declines
After holding steady for most of January, the hot rolled (HR) index has started to gain some downward momentum. In the last 30 days, it has declined $89 per short ton (st) and is sitting just above $1,000/st.
HRC futures: A flock of canaries in the mine
Much has happened since we last met on Jan. 4. Cleveland-Cliffs announced a price increase on Jan. 3, lifting the futures market in the morning only for it to finish the day $20-$30 per short ton (st) below those morning highs. On Jan. 4, the futures curve was down another $10-$28/st. And in my column for SMU that evening, I asked a question: Would those aggressive sellers be met with a short-squeeze forcing them to cover, or had the market peaked with the negative price action to start the year the proverbial canary in the coal mine?