Steel Mills

Analysts Weigh in on Potential Sale of U.S. Steel
Written by Becca Moczygemba
August 16, 2023
U.S. Steel dropped a bombshell last week when it announced that it is up for sale. While a company buyout would be profitable for any buyer, there could be regulatory hurdles, according to industry analysts.
Recall the Pittsburgh-based steelmaker announced on Aug.13 that it had initiated a formal review process for strategic alternatives after receiving multiple unsolicited offers to buy the company.
The company has already received two publicly-announced offers: One for $7.3 billion in cash and stock from competitor Cleveland-Cliffs, which was rejected by U.S. Steel; and a second, all-cash offer of $7.8 billion from privately held firm Esmark.

“U. S. Steel’s Board and management team are committed to maximizing value for our stockholders, and to that end, we have commenced a comprehensive and thorough review of strategic alternatives,” said David B. Burritt, U. S. Steel’s president, CEO, and member of the board of directors, in a press release.
Steel industry analysts weighed in with their thoughts on the actual execution of a deal.
Timna Tanners, managing director of equity research at Wolfe Research, said a purchase by Cliffs would allow the Cleveland-based organization to grow. “The separate entities would otherwise see earnings shrink after abnormally strong 2021/22 steel prices,” she commented in a research note.
“If this merger concludes, I expect that Cliffs will continue to secure visibly higher profitability in this market and smooth out much of the cyclical peaks and valleys in the steel industry,” Josh Spoores, principal analyst at CRU, told SMU.
Additionally, “The proforma company would have the advantage of complementary capabilities in iron ore, DRI, scrap, and integrated/EAF steelmaking,” according to a research note from Phil Gibbs, senior equity research analyst at KeyBanc Capital Markets.
While the acquisition of U.S. Steel could be an advantageous move for Cliffs, regulations may be an obstacle.
Though Cliffs said it would get regulatory approval, Tanners thinks that dominance in the US automotive-quality, appliance, and tin sheet steel supply would elicit antitrust concerns.
Gibbs also said that regulatory issues would likely be problematic, but believes Cliffs has taken that into consideration.
“We believe the probability of this deal closing is low without meaningful concessions,” Gibbs noted.

Becca Moczygemba
Read more from Becca MoczygembaLatest in Steel Mills

August US mill shipments slip but still higher than last year
The American Iron and Steel Institute reported a decline in the monthly shipments of US mills from July to August.

TransPod, Algoma, Supreme Steel linkup anchors Canadian steel in high-speed transit build
The three Canadian companies have announced a strategic partnership to support the development of an ultra-high-speed transit line from Edmonton to Calgary.

Metallus, USW agree to tentative four-year labor deal
Metallus and the United Steelworkers (USW) have agreed to a tentative four-year labor contract.

ArcelorMittal Dofasco resumes cokemaking after emergency maintenance
The Canadian steelmaker reported on Sept. 30 that “urgent maintenance” was needed in its coke plant off-gas systems. The work required coke oven gas from the No. 2 coke plant to be flared for most of that week.

AISI: Raw steel production ticks back down
US raw steel output declined last week after increasing the week prior, according to the latest data from the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). Output has see-sawed from week to week since mid-August. Still, it has remained historically strong over the past four months and has held near multi-year highs since June. Domestic mills […]