Trade Cases
Vietnam Circumvention Ruling Coming Oct. 17
Written by John Packard
September 12, 2017
Over the weekend, we received a message from trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz regarding the status of the Vietnam circumvention suit. This is the one where the domestic steel mills filed a circumvention suit alleging China is circumventing the duties on cold rolled and CORE (corrosion resistant) steels by sending substrate to Vietnam and having it converted there before shipment to the U.S. as Vietnamese material.
Lewis told us, “Commerce announced today that it will issue a preliminary determination in the Vietnam circumvention proceedings (cold-rolled and corrosion resistant steel) on Oct. 16. The decision will be publicly available on the next business day (Oct. 17). The Commerce Department previously announced that the final determinations will be issued on Feb. 15, 2018.”
One of the core questions at issue is how to define “significant transformation,” when steel is converted and in the process changes from one product to another. For example, when hot rolled substrate is converted by “cold rolling,” thus reducing the thickness of the steel and the surface. Hot rolled then becomes cold rolled. The same happens when cold rolled steel is converted to galvanized steel by adding zinc to the surface of the substrate (limited changes to thickness).
The expectation is that the U.S. Department of Commerce will take some action, probably against Chinese substrate being converted into another product as a means of sending it to the United States. However, as one steel mill executive told SMU, “My take is the petitioners will ‘win’ something on Vietnam. But the only way to shut Vietnam off is to go with a straight dumping case, something the mills should have done a long time ago. But they decided to back the wrong horse with the Section 232 instead.” Vietnam has made a change away from Chinese substrate, so there may be no impact of a decision in favor of the domestic mills, he added.
We will learn more on Oct. 17 when the public is made aware of the DOC preliminary recommendation.
Written by: John Packard, John@SteelMarketUpdate.com
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.