Steel Mills
Letter to the Editor: New Trade Cases Are Not in the Steel Industry’s Best Interest
Written by John Packard
July 16, 2014
We have had a number of end users and service centers who are against the filing of any new steel trade cases contact us to express their opinions. Most do not want to be identified. We received the following letter to the editor from an executive at a service center who asked that we not attribute the letter directly to them. However, we feel it does express the views of many in the industry which are not getting much attention recently:
The following are reasons any filed trade cases on light flat rolled steel products will be unsuccessful in getting new tariffs established:
1. Two tier market pricing established – Market pricing for the past 10 years has been a gap of $80 to $100 per ton on import versus domestic pricing. This gap is market derived and for customers that: first, can use import, and second, can forecast 6 months out, it can result in a market savings. This gap has been relatively consistent for the past 10 years and is justified.
2. No injury – There is no injury to domestic mills. They are all relatively profitable and there have been no closures as a result of imports. (Sparrows Point, Wheeling Pitt, WCI, all closed within the past 5 years because of high costs, no modernization, poor locations, and a variety of extraneous reasons)
3. No dumping – China and India are exporting equal to the same costs that they are selling in their home markets. This is transparent in several world market price indexes. They are successful in exporting to the US because we have the highest priced steel market in the world.
4. Mills crying wolf again – about half of all trade cases are filed by steel mills. The industry has cried wolf too many times, this time is no exception, and the mills credibility continues to erode at the ITC.
5. No recent precedent with pipe trade ruling – The recent ruling on @ 15% tariff on Korean pipe and tube was justified, because there was a spike in volume, 96% of South Korea’s volume is sold in the US at prices that were reportedly $200 per ton under domestic prices and USS shut down two pipe mills demonstrating injury. Light flat rolled market circumstances are very different.
6. Jobs / Votes – the US manufacturing base has more jobs and votes and it is in their best interest that trade cases not be filed and new tariffs established. Newly created tariffs would not be pro job creation policy. This is a political issue and the politicians will vote in favor of no new tariffs on imported flat rolled, and the large steel intensive OEMs will heavily lobby to this effect. The Steel Workers have not supported trade cases on flat rolled, because there are more union jobs to be lost in manufacturing if US steel prices continue to go significantly higher than world pricing.
7. Market balance – The US market historically needs 30%, or roughly 30 million tons, of imported light flat rolled steel products to balance supply and demand. The US mills are the biggest importers, as there are many converters and value added conversion by US mills — Calvert, CSI, Steelscape, AK, plus others are all melt short. The US mills threaten trade cases which disrupts the supply balance, increases prices and profits at the mills — this game has been being played for decades.
8. New low input costs – Iron ore costs are at or near 5 year lows and domestic mills have not commensurately lowered steel prices along with the rest of the world market. This increased profitability will make demonstrating injury near impossible.
9. Recent WTO ruling – earlier this week the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled against the United States and suggested that the U.S. was bending the rules when it came to Chinese OCTG and other products.
Summary opinion – trade cases will possibly be filed. The psychological market effect from simply the rumor of filing the cases is a victory for the mills as the temporary effects are less import orders and higher domestic pricing. The current USS price increase announcement and rumored higher price moves from others is evidence these rumors are already working for the mills. If the mills were serious about winning the trade cases they would not be increasing prices / profits because proving injury will be much tougher. If new cases are filed and tariffs are approved on light flat rolled steel products, faith in our trade laws will be seriously eroded….
SMU Note: That is the opinion of one of our readers. We welcome yours. You can send them to: info@SteelMarketUpdate.com.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills
Cliffs hosts fireside chat on industry, union, government collaboration
Cleveland-Cliffs’s Chairman, President, and CEO Lourenco Goncalves hosted a fireside chat with US Trade Representative Katherine Tai and Acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su on Friday at the company’s plate mill in Coatesville, Pa.
Nippon agrees to sell stake in AM/NS Calvert to ArcelorMittal
ArcelorMittal is set to take full ownership of AM/NS Calvert if Nippon Steel finalizes its pending acquisition of U.S. Steel.
SDI first steelmaker with carbon targets certified by GSCC
Steel Dynamics Inc. (SDI) has become the world’s first steel producer with carbon targets certified by the Global Steel Climate Council (GSCC).
ArcelorMittal Mexico to return to full production next week
After a complete stoppage earlier this year, ArcelorMittal Mexico’s steel mill in Lazaro Cardenas, in the state of Michoacán, will soon return to full production.
Stelco/Cliffs deal clears antitrust hurdle in Canada
Stelco Inc. said that the Canadian Competition Bureau will not challenge Cleveland-Cliffs’ pending buy of the Hamilton, Ontario-based steelmaker.