Steel Mills
Steel Mills Must Prove "Dumping" & "Injury" in Steel Trade Cases
Written by John Packard
January 29, 2015
So far Steel Market Update has heard a similar cry in each steel mill earnings conference call. The domestic mills are not happy about the amount of foreign steel coming into the country and the growing percentage of market share foreign steel is taking from the domestic mills.
We are hearing a couple of terms which are not interchangeable but are both important pieces of the puzzle when steel mills consider filing a trade case under U.S. law. These are “dumping” and “injury” and we turned to two attorneys (Roger Schagrin and Lewis Leibowitz) who are experts on the subject to provide us insights:
Dumping means:
1) That the steel is being sold at less than their domestic market pricing or,
2) That the steel being sold is less than their cost to produce the product.
After the mills file a trade case the “Dumping” portion is found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (US DOC)
Injury means (article continues below):
{loadposition reserved_message}
The domestic steel industry producing competing products is suffering real or imminent threat of material injury.
After a country or foreign mill has been found to be “dumping” then “Injury” is determined by the International Trade Commission (ITC)
A successful dumping order requires both dumping and injury.
We asked trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz about the subject of dumping and what is needed in order to file a trade case against foreign steel. Here is what he had to say:
“I want to explain this in detail. To start, a dumping order requires both dumping (found by the Commerce Dept.) and injury (found by the International Trade Commission).
“Dumping is underselling the home market price or selling below the cost of production. In a nonmarket case (e.g., China) the test is different. The home market price is not relevant. The test is based on the cost of production using the factors of production of the producer, but valued based on the costs in a market economy.
“Injury means material injury to the industry producing competing products in the US or a real and imminent threat of such injury. If half the Commissioners find injury or threat, the vote is considered affirmative.
“So both dumping and injury are required…
“The steel industry files cases sometimes that they don’t win. But they can disrupt hearken for a year by filing them.”
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills
U.S. Steel sues Algoma over iron pellet shipments
U.S. Steel is suing Algoma over the Canadian flat-rolled producer's rejection of iron pellet shipments, arguing it has breached its contract.
August US mill shipments slip but still higher than last year
The American Iron and Steel Institute reported a decline in the monthly shipments of US mills from July to August.
TransPod, Algoma, Supreme Steel linkup anchors Canadian steel in high-speed transit build
The three Canadian companies have announced a strategic partnership to support the development of an ultra-high-speed transit line from Edmonton to Calgary.
Metallus, USW agree to tentative four-year labor deal
Metallus and the United Steelworkers (USW) have agreed to a tentative four-year labor contract.
ArcelorMittal Dofasco resumes cokemaking after emergency maintenance
The Canadian steelmaker reported on Sept. 30 that “urgent maintenance” was needed in its coke plant off-gas systems. The work required coke oven gas from the No. 2 coke plant to be flared for most of that week.