Steel Market Update (SMU) received this Letter to the Editor from a steel trading company executive providing an opinion on the recent slew of antidumping trade suits on flat rolled steels:
First of all congratulations to Dave Phelps for his comments. As the longtime president of AIIS he has personally seen many years of domestic steel industry complaints being filed.
I would like to add a few points;
1. Ever since 1968 the US domestic steel industry has gone to Washington for help instead of competing on quality, service, modernization and developing an export business themselves. Yes, they are exporting to Canada and Mexico but exports to the rest of the world are almost non existent.
2. Many of our exports to Canada and Mexico are coming back to the USA as a manufactured product. How does that protect the domestic manufacturing basis?
3. As Dave pointed out correctly there are 60 times more manufacturing jobs in steel consuming industries than in the domestic steel industry and that doesn’t include customs brokers/agents, trucking companies, warehouse operators and others making their money on steel imports. The port of New Orleans can tell you a story about what it means if no steel is imported.
4. Successful dumping suits often result in higher domestic prices which make manufacturers in the US less competitive when selling abroad and competing with imported finished products here in the US. Not so long ago the price difference between domestic HRC/CRC and the world market was about $300/ton. Just imagine what advantage a manufacturer of water heaters, metal furniture, BBQ’s or tubular products has regardless whether he is in Korea, Japan or Spain?
5. For some strange reason it is often not mentioned that 25% of all steel imports are semi finished steel products, basically all slabs. Has anyone ever seen a countervailing duty complaint being filed against the importation of slabs? How can you accuse Brazilian steel makers of having received illegal government subsidies on their CRC exports but they are not subsidized on their slab exports?
6. 50 years ago the US steel industry was on top of the world, after the destruction of the steel industries in Europe and Japan we were the biggest. Companies like US Steel, Bethlehem Steel and Armco were names recognized around the world. Today the largest steel maker in the USA (Nucor) is No.14 in the world, and US Steel is No.18. Among the top 100 steel producers in the world the US has five! (Our third largest is No.57)
There is no doubt that the overcapacity in China has changed the world of steel dramatically and 100 Million tons of exports from China are hurting steel industries worldwide. Is the filing of dumping and countervailing suits against countries like Japan, the UK, Italy or the Netherlands going to change that ?
John PackardRead more from John Packard
Latest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: The future of WTO dispute settlement in the MC 13 conference
This week, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ministerial conference convenes in Abu Dhabi, UAE. There are many issues on the WTO’s plate. The question is whether any resolution of these matters is likely or even possible. One of the most important issues is the future of the dispute settlement system, which has been rendered impotent […]
Leibowitz: Could change at the ITC keep Weirton tin mill open?
The International Trade Commission (ITC) voted earlier this month against imposing antidumping and countervailing duties on imports of tin mill products from four countries. When Cliffs filed trade cases on tin mill products in early 2023, the company claimed that the failure to get massive duties on imports would result in the closure of its mill in Weirton, W.Va. We don’t know the reasoning behind this decision, only that all four sitting Commissioners voted not to impose duties. We do know that Cliffs plans to close Weirton.
Cliffs to idle Weirton mill after tinplate trade case decision
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. announced on Thursday, Feb. 15, that it will indefinitely idle tinplate production at its mill in Weirton, W.Va.
Leibowitz on trade: Consumers win one at the ITC
Last week, steel consumers prevailed in a rare victory over US petitioners in trade cases on tin mill steel products. The US International Trade Commission (ITC) voted 4—0 that Cleveland-Cliffs, the sole remaining domestic producer of tin mill products (used to make containers such as “tin cans”) was neither injured nor threatened with injury by imports of competing products from Canada, China, and Germany. Imports from South Korea were found to be “negligible,” and the investigation on Korean imports was terminated.
ITC votes not to impose duties on tin mill product imports
At the final hour, the trade case investigating unfairly traded imports of tin mill products has been terminated.