The flat rolled steel trading community has been hit and hit hard by the filing of antidumping trade suits on galvanized, Galvalume (zinc-aluminum) . As one trader put it to us earlier this week, “Business as usual has been blown up for the traders.”
A number of traders spoke to SMU about the scope of the filings, the sheer number of tons affected. Traders told SMU that there are not enough steel mills left in the world that could fill the void left if all of the mills are impacted.
This is not to say that there aren’t foreign steel mills willing to take a bite out of the U.S. flat rolled steel pie. SMU understands that Vietnam has been very active in the cold rolled and coated steel markets.
We learned that Vietnamese cold rolled material was being sold this week at less than $500 per ton delivered into a USA port. Our current domestic average price FOB mill is $580 per ton.
One of the West Coast traders told us that there is going to be an issue with galvanized products should all of the countries affected by the filing remain (China, Korea, India, Taiwan & Italy). Their opinion was the Vietnamese mills could handle approximately 50 percent of the shortfall but they do not know where the balance will come from.
We were told that the U.S. West Coast market, “…is an offshore market.”
“There is going to be a shortage of galvanized on the West Coast,” said one trader.
When asked about selling prices dropping from foreign steel sources the trader explained to us that commodity prices, currency values against the U.S. dollar and over capacity have led to price drops on the world market. The cost to produce steel have dropped in China and elsewhere and just because steel prices are being offered at lower prices here in the domestic market does not mean the steel is being “dumped” here.
“This doesn’t do anybody any good,” the West Coast trader told us. There has been an exodus of U.S. manufacturing off the West Coast going offshore, Mexico or moving further to the Eastern USA. As prices escalate and sources of supply become questionable the answer for many manufacturing firms is to move their products overseas thus costing jobs here in the USA.
The traders were being careful in their conversations with SMU to point out that prices will rise here in the United States, going against the tide for the rest of the world. “We are going to find a new normal for where steel is going to trade in the United States. It is not going to be $600 hot rolled but probably more like the $460-$540 range.”
We received a note from a long time trader who told us, “We have read your report about the ‘ trifecta ‘ which is indeed a historic moment. I don’t believe that this has ever happened before. By basically taking out imports of three of the four main import product groups ( the fourth being slabs ) the domestic steel industry will force many buyers/users of steel who are far away from a domestic mill to pay substantial premiums for inland freight on top of what will most certainly be higher prices. Manufacturers of products made mostly from steel will find it even more difficult to compete.”
This trader went on to say, “The case includes countervailing duty filings against Brazil, one of the main exporters of slabs to the US. How can a steel mill be subsidized on their exports of HRC but not on the slabs? A little double standard maybe?”
We also probed whether or not there is a large collection of unsold galvanized and cold rolled steels sitting at the ports. We asked a number of traders from the east coast to the west and we heard that the inventories did not exist.
SMU is aware of one slug of unsold hot rolled but we are not aware of large positions having been taken on coated and cold rolled. We will continue to research this subject and would appreciate any feedback you might have: info@SteelMarketUpdate.com
A number of traders are worried that it is only a matter of time before what is perceived as a weak market suddenly turns with the domestic mill lead times moving out and prices moving up.
It is not “if” but rather “when” that is the question you should be considering.
John PackardRead more from John Packard
Latest in Trade Cases
China Has Failed to Comply With WTO Commitments: AISI
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) has laid out a case for China’s failure to comply with its World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations, which it joined in 2001.
Deputy USTR Hits Out at ‘Surge’ of Mexican Steel Imports
Deputy United States Trade Representative (USTR) Jayme White met on Wednesday with Mexico’s Under Secretary of Economy for Foreign Trade Alejandro Encinas, and discussed issues regarding the “surge” into the US of Mexican steel and aluminum imports.
Leibowitz: Europe Aims to Impose Countervailing Duties on EVs From China
Trade policy moves create great ironies sometimes. I often write about these ironies when the US acts against the interests of the country as a whole by protecting certain industries from international competition. But the US is not alone, especially in recent years as the World Trade Organization and the international geopolitical order have been […]
Leibowitz: Banning Inputs and Components—Effective Policy or Not?
As the global trading system, which used to be “rules-based,” continues its slide toward the absence (defiance? disregard?) of rules, governments around the world are trying new things.
Leibowitz: Warming Commercial Relations? The Raimondo Visit to China
Last week the Secretary of Commerce, Gina Raimondo, visited China for high-level meetings with the Chinese government. Her counterpart, Wang Wentao, China’s Commerce Minister, participated in the discussions. The four-day meeting included an announcement of two new working groups dealing with US-China economic relationships. The first was a forum to explain US export controls relating […]