SMU Data and Models

Negotiations: Mills Talking Price Despite Price Increase Announcements
Written by Tim Triplett
August 17, 2017
Steel buyers and sellers reported mills slightly more open to steel price discussions, based on responses this week from Steel Market Update’s flat rolled market trends questionnaire, possibly reflecting the seasonal slowdown in sales activity. What makes the results collected on mills willingness to negotiate pricing especially interesting is the domestic steel mills began announcing price increases on flat rolled on Tuesday of this week after raising plate prices on Monday.
Over the course of this week, SMU has canvassed active participants in the flat rolled steel markets to capture any changes in market trends. The more than 100 responses to this week’s questionnaire offer a snapshot of how steel mills are handling price negotiations.
As in the last report, respondents continue to see mills sending mixed signals on their willingness to negotiate steel prices. The majority of buyers, 59 percent, say mills are open to negotiation, up from 53 percent of buyers two weeks ago. Another 33 percent—down slightly from 37 percent in the last report— say mill order books are weaker than expected and some mills do tend to be open to price discussions. Only 8 percent have found that mill order books are full and negotiation is off the table, down from 10 percent of buyers who said mills were holding the line two weeks ago.
By product category, 75 percent of manufacturing and service center respondents saw mills willing to negotiate hot roll orders, up from 68 percent in the last report. In cold roll, the percentage jumped to 73 percent who found the price negotiable, from 61 percent two weeks ago. Galvanized saw a slight dip to 60 percent from 66 percent, while Galvalume jumped to 70 percent from 54 percent, indicating more willingness to talk price on coated products.
Comments from respondents indicate the level of willingness to talk price depends on the mill and the product. Order books are weaker than advertised, observed one service center executive, adding, “Orders shipping early is not a bullish indicator.” Said a manufacturer, “It’s still a seller’s market, but the momentum is slowing down a bit until Section 232, 301 and 337 are front and center again. Perhaps in 2018.”
Note: SMU surveys active steel buyers twice each month to gauge the willingness of their steel suppliers to negotiate pricing. The results reflect current steel demand and changing spot pricing trends. SMU provides our members with a number of ways to interact with current and historical data. To see an interactive history of our Steel Mill Negotiations data, visit our website here.

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in SMU Data and Models

SMU Survey: Buyers’ Sentiment rebounds from multi-year low
Both of SMU’s Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices edged higher this week. Current Sentiment rebounded from a near five-year low, while Future Sentiment rose to a two-month high

SMU flat-rolled market survey results now available
SMU’s latest steel buyers market survey results are now available on our website to all premium members.

SMU Survey: Sheet lead times pull back after early-June blip, plate holds
Following the uptick seen two weeks ago, lead times eased this week for all four sheet products tracked by SMU, while plate lead times held steady, according to this week’s market survey.

SMU Survey: Pricing power abruptly shifts to steel buyers
The majority of steel buyers responding to our latest market survey say domestic mills are more willing to talk price on sheet and plate products than they were earlier this month. Sheet negotiation rates rebounded across the board compared to early June, while our plate negotiation rate hit a full 100%.

Service centers: Mill orders down marginally in May
SMU’s Mill Order Index (MOI) declined for a third straight month in May, but only marginally.